Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35675446›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2022

Evaluation of functional MRI-based human brain parcellation: a review.

Pantea Moghimi, Anh The Dang, Quan Do, Theoden I Netoff, Kelvin O Lim, Gowtham Atluri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural manifold connectomics reveals multiregime functional connectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Spacetime concordance in the primate cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The elusive metric of lesion load.Brain structure & function · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pantea MoghimiDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Anh The DangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Quan DoDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Theoden I NetoffDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-0115-1930
Kelvin O LimDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Gowtham AtluriDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-5619-6688

Funding

TRD4 - Ultrahigh Field Engineering and SafetyP41EB027061 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Gregory John Metzger, KAMIL UGURBIL · 2019 to 2026
$11.7M
White Matter Abnormalities in SchizophreniaR01MH060662 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LIM, KELVIN O. · 2001 to 2010
$3.8M
Functional Connectivity Changes During Early Recovery as a Marker for RelapseR01DA038984 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LIM, KELVIN O. · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
High Performance Connectome Upgrade for Human 3T MR ScannerS10OD017974 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LIM, KELVIN O. · 2014 to 2014
$600k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027061NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038984NIH HHS S10 OD017974NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain parcellations play a crucial role in the analysis of brain imaging data sets, as they can significantly affect the outcome of the analysis. In recent years, several novel approaches for constructing MRI-based brain parcellations have been developed with promising results. In the absence of ground truth, several evaluation approaches have been used to evaluate currently available brain parcellations. In this article, we review and critique methods used for evaluating functional brain parcellations constructed using fMRI data sets. We also describe how some of these evaluation methods have been used to estimate the optimal parcellation granularity. We provide a critical discussion of the current approach to the problem of identifying the optimal brain parcellation that is suited for a given neuroimaging study. We argue that the criteria for an optimal brain parcellation must depend on the application the parcellation is intended for. We describe a teleological approach to the evaluation of brain parcellations, where brain parcellations are evaluated in different contexts and optimal brain parcellations for each context are identified separately. We conclude by discussing several directions for further research that would result in improved evaluation strategies.

Indexed as

Brain MappingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingbrain parcellationevaluationfMRIfunctional neuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID35675446
PMCPMC9291407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.