Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35675370›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

Immunogenicity of a Third Dose of BNT162b2 to Ancestral Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and the Omicron Variant in Adults Who Received 2 Doses of Inactivated Vaccine.

Nancy H L Leung, Samuel M S Cheng, Mario Martín-Sánchez, Niki Y M Au, Yvonne Y Ng, Leo L H Luk, Karl C K Chan, John K C Li, Yonna W Y Leung, Leo C H Tsang and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05057182 (mRNA Vaccination to Boost Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 in Recipients of Inactivated Vaccines), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05057182 phase4completednot on this map

mRNA Vaccination to Boost Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 in Recipients of Inactivated Vaccines (the "mBoost" Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2021 to 2024Enrolled300ConditionsCOVID 19 VaccineArmsBNT162b2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. From Immunogen to COVID-19 vaccines: Prospects for the post-pandemic era.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy H L LeungWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Samuel M S ChengWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Mario Martín-SánchezWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Niki Y M AuWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Yvonne Y NgWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Leo L H LukWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Karl C K ChanWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
John K C LiWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Yonna W Y LeungWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Leo C H TsangWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Sara ChaothaiWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Kelvin K H KwanWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Dennis K M IpWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Leo L M PoonWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Gabriel M LeungWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
J S Malik PeirisWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Benjamin J CowlingWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing (LKS) Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6297-7154
University of Hong Kong · HKHong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited data exist on antibody responses to mixed vaccination strategies that involve inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, particularly in the context of emerging variants.

methodsWe conducted an open-label trial of a third vaccine dose of a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine (BNT162b2, Fosun Pharma/BioNTech) in adults aged ≥30 years who had previously received 2 doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine. We collected blood samples before administering the third dose and 28 days later and tested for antibodies to the ancestral virus using a binding assay (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]), a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT), and a live virus plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). We also tested for antibodies against the Omicron variant using live-virus PRNT.

resultsIn 315 participants, a third dose of BNT162b2 substantially increased antibody titers on each assay. Mean ELISA levels increased from an optical density of 0.3 to 2.2 (P < .001), and mean sVNT levels increased from an inhibition of 17% to 96% (P < .001). In a random subset of 20 participants, the geometric mean PRNT50 titers rose substantially, by 45-fold from day 0 to day 28 against the ancestral virus (P < .001) and by 11-fold against the Omicron variant (P < .001). In daily monitoring, post-vaccination reactions subsided within 7 days for more than 99% of participants.

conclusionsA third dose of COVID-19 vaccine with an mRNA vaccine substantially improved antibody levels against the ancestral virus and the Omicron variant with a well-tolerated safety profile in adults who had received 2 doses of inactivated vaccine 6 months earlier. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT05057182.

Indexed as

BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19AdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesRNA, MessengerVaccines, InactivatedBNT162b2boosterCoronaVacCOVID vaccineimmunogenicity

Identifiers

PMID35675370
PMCPMC9384189
OpenAlexW4282922345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.