Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35675365›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Bacterial contamination of chicken meat in slaughterhouses and the associated risk factors: A nationwide study in Thailand.

Kunnanut Klaharn, Duangporn Pichpol, Tongkorn Meeyam, Thanida Harintharanon, Patpong Lohaanukul, Veerasak Punyapornwithaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis of Colistin-Resistant,Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular Evidence of ClonalFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kunnanut KlaharnFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Bioscience, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Duangporn PichpolFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Bioscience, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Tongkorn MeeyamFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Bioscience, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7284-4371
Thanida HarintharanonDepartment of Livestock Development, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patpong LohaanukulDepartment of Livestock Development, Bangkok, Thailand.
Veerasak PunyapornwithayaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Public Health Research Group, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9870-7773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slaughterhouses are a key source of bacterial contamination in poultry meat and products, which is a major health and economic concern for several public authorities. This study aimed to quantify the non-compliance of bacterial contamination on chicken meat sampled from slaughterhouses and identify risk factors associated with the contamination. A questionnaire survey of 569 chicken slaughterhouses was undertaken and 1,707 meat samples were collected to determine the level of bacterial contamination. The proportion of the non-compliance associated with aerobic plate count [APC] (24.6%), Staphylococcus aureus (6.3%), Enterococcus spp. (24.7%), coliforms (13.5%), Escherichia coli (33.3%), and Salmonella spp. (33.4%) based on the livestock authorities' criteria was determined. Our results highlighted that the scalding process without scalding water temperature control or improper scalding increased the risk of APC (odds ratio, OR = 4.84, 95% CI: 2.72-8.61), S. aureus (OR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.29-5.55), Enterococcus spp. (OR = 3.38, 95% CI: 2.01-5.69), coliforms (OR = 3.01, 95% CI: 1.47-6.15), and E. coli (OR = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.58-4.56) contamination on meat samples. Meat from eviscerated carcasses was more likely to be non-compliance due to contamination by E. coli (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.14-3.38). Furthermore, open or semi-closed system slaughterhouses (OR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.23-2.60) and lack of equipment for specific slaughtering areas (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.04-2.61) increased the likelihood of Salmonella spp. occurrence. This is the first study of factors influencing the non-compliance of meat samples across Thailand. Authorities can use the study findings to enhance food safety strategies at the national level.

Indexed as

AbattoirsChickensAnimalsBacteriaEscherichia coliFood ContaminationFood MicrobiologyMeatSalmonellaStaphylococcus aureusThailand

Identifiers

PMID35675365
PMCPMC9176793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.