Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35675288›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

High-quality and easy-to-regenerate personal filter.

Max Fraenkl, Milos Krbal, Jakub Houdek, Zuzana Olmrova Zmrhalova, Borivoj Prokes, Petr Hejda, Stanislav Slang, Jan Prikryl, Jakub Ondracek, Otakar Makes and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Max FraenklCenter of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5921-4228
Milos KrbalCenter of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Jakub HoudekCenter of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Zuzana Olmrova ZmrhalovaCenter of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Borivoj ProkesCenter of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Petr HejdaCenter of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Stanislav SlangCenter of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7760-2964
Jan PrikrylCenter of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Jakub OndracekInstitute of Chemical Process Fundamentals, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojova, Prague, Czech Republic.
Otakar MakesInstitute of Chemical Process Fundamentals, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojova, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8781-9227
Juraj KostykInstitute of Chemical Process Fundamentals, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojova, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr NasadilTextile Testing Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Pavel MalcikTextile Testing Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Vladimir ZdimalInstitute of Chemical Process Fundamentals, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojova, Prague, Czech Republic.
Miroslav VlcekCenter of Materials and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proper respiratory tract protection is the key factor to limiting the rate of COVID-19 spread and providing a safe environment for health care workers. Traditional N95 (FFP2) respirators are not easy to regenerate and thus create certain financial and ecological burdens; moreover, their quality may vary significantly. A solution that would overcome these disadvantages is desirable. In this study a commercially available knit polyester fleece fabric was selected as the filter material, and a total of 25 filters of different areas and thicknesses were prepared. Then, the size-resolved filtration efficiency (40-400 nm) and pressure drop were evaluated at a volumetric flow rate of 95 L/min. We showed the excellent synergistic effect of expanding the filtration area and increasing the number of filtering layers on the filtration efficiency; a filter cartridge with 8 layers of knit polyester fabric with a surface area of 900 cm2 and sized 25 × 14 × 8 cm achieved filtration efficiencies of 98% at 95 L/min and 99.5% at 30 L/min. The assembled filter kit consists of a filter cartridge (14 Pa) carried in a small backpack connected to a half mask with a total pressure drop of 84 Pa at 95 L/min. In addition, it is reusable, and the filter material can be regenerated at least ten times by simple methods, such as boiling. We have demonstrated a novel approach for creating high-quality and easy-to-breathe-through respiratory protective equipment that reduces operating costs and is a green solution because it is easy to regenerate.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Protective DevicesAerosolsEquipment DesignFiltrationHumansMasksMaterials TestingPolyestersAerosolsPolyesters

Identifiers

PMID35675288
PMCPMC9176855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.