ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2022
FlowRAU-Net: Accelerated 4D Flow MRI of Aortic Valvular Flows With a Deep 2D Residual Attention Network.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- FlowVN Trained on a Single Dataset Enables Rapid Reconstruction of Highly Accelerated 4D Flow MRI Across Multiple Sites.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- WSM-Net: a weakly supervised multimodal network based on attention mechanism and fusion strategy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimizing encoding strategies for 4D Flow MRI of mean and turbulent flow.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- 4Dflow-VP-Net: A deep convolutional neural network for noninvasive estimation of relative pressures in stenotic flows from 4D flow MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Emerging Trends in Fast MRI Using Deep-Learning Reconstruction on Undersampled k-Space Data: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction for Cardiac MRI: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we propose a novel deep learning reconstruction framework for rapid and accurate reconstruction of 4D flow MRI data. Reconstruction is performed on a slice-by-slice basis by reducing artifacts in zero-filled reconstructed complex images obtained from undersampled k-space. A deep residual attention network FlowRAU-Net is proposed, trained separately for each encoding direction with 2D complex image slices extracted from complex 4D images at each temporal frame and slice position. The network was trained and tested on 4D flow MRI data of aortic valvular flow in 18 human subjects. Performance of the reconstructions was measured in terms of image quality, 3-D velocity vector accuracy, and accuracy in hemodynamic parameters. Reconstruction performance was measured for three different k-space undersamplings and compared with one state of the art compressed sensing reconstruction method and three deep learning-based reconstruction methods. The proposed method outperforms state of the art methods in all performance measures for all three different k-space undersamplings. Hemodynamic parameters such as blood flow rate and peak velocity from the proposed technique show good agreement with reference flow parameters. Visualization of the reconstructed image and velocity magnitude also shows excellent agreement with the fully sampled reference dataset. Moreover, the proposed method is computationally fast. Total 4D flow data (including all slices in space and time) for a subject can be reconstructed in 69 seconds on a single GPU. Although the proposed method has been applied to 4D flow MRI of aortic valvular flows, given a sufficient number of training samples, it should be applicable to other arterial flows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.