Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35675080›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2022

Evaluation of the association of anticholinergic burden and delirium in older hospitalised patients - A cohort study comparing 19 anticholinergic burden scales.

Angela Lisibach, Giulia Gallucci, Valérie Benelli, Ramona Kälin, Sven Schulthess, Patrick E Beeler, Chantal Csajka, Monika Lutters

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela LisibachClinical Pharmacy, Department Medical Services, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Baden, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8697-492X
Giulia GallucciClinical Pharmacy, Department Medical Services, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Valérie BenelliClinical Pharmacy, Department Medical Services, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Ramona KälinClinical Pharmacy, Department Medical Services, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Sven SchulthessClinical Pharmacy, Department Medical Services, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Baden, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1786-1670
Patrick E BeelerDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich & University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Chantal CsajkaCenter for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Monika LuttersClinical Pharmacy, Department Medical Services, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Kantonsspital Baden · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsA recent review identified 19 anticholinergic burden scales (ABSs) but no study has yet compared the impact of all 19 ABSs on delirium. We evaluated whether a high anticholinergic burden as classified by each ABS is associated with incident delirium.

methodWe performed a retrospective cohort study in a Swiss tertiary teaching hospital using data from 2015-2018. Included were patients aged ≥65, hospitalised ≥48 hours with no stay >24 hours in intensive care. Delirium was defined twofold: (i) ICD-10 or CAM and (ii) ICD-10 or CAM or DOSS. Patients' cumulative anticholinergic burden score, calculated within 24 hours after admission, was classified using a binary (<3: low, ≥3: high burden) and a categorical approach (0: no, 0.5-3: low, ≥3: high burden). Association was analysed using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsOver 25 000 patients (mean age 77.9 ± 7.6 years) were included. Of these, (i) 864 (3.3%) and (ii) 2770 (11.0%) developed delirium. Depending on the evaluated ABS, 4-63% of the patients were exposed to at least one anticholinergic drug. Out of 19 ABSs, (i) 14 and (ii) 16 showed a significant association with the outcomes. A patient with a high anticholinergic burden score had odds ratios (ORs) of 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.42) to 2.63 (95% CI: 2.28-3.03) for incident delirium compared to those with low or no burden.

conclusionA high anticholinergic burden within 24 hours after admission was significantly associated with incident delirium. Although prospective studies need to confirm these results, discontinuing or substituting drugs with a score of ≥3 at admission might be a targeted intervention to reduce incident delirium.

Indexed as

Cholinergic AntagonistsDeliriumAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesCholinergic Antagonistsanticholinergic burdendelirium during hospitalisationDOSSolder patients

Identifiers

PMID35675080
PMCPMC9796852
OpenAlexW4282570336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.