Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35674882›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of implant dentistry2022

The effectiveness of adjunctive measures in managing peri-implant mucositis: an umbrella review.

Sompol Chuachamsai, Aneesha Acharya, Kai Fischer, Luigi Nibali, Dominic Ho, Georgios Pelekos

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of implant dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Sompol ChuachamsaiDivision of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Aneesha AcharyaDr D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, India.
Kai FischerClinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, Division of Periodontology and Peri-Implant Diseases, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Luigi NibaliPeriodontology Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, Centre for Host-Microbiome Interactions, King's College London, London, UK.
Dominic HoDivision of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Georgios PelekosDivision of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China. george74@hku.hk.ORCID 0000-0003-1917-1988
University of Hong Kong · HKDr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune · INKing's College London · GBPrince Philip Dental Hospital · CNUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this umbrella review was to gather and summarize the data from published systematic reviews (SRs) that compared non-surgical mechanical debridement (NSMD) with and without the use of adjunctive treatments on the management of peri-implant mucositis (PIM). MATERIALS AND

methodsA protocol was developed and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021254350) before the systematic search for the SRs. Seven electronic databases, including Cochrane Library, Embase (via Ovid), MEDLINE (via Pubmed), Proquest, Prospero, Scopus and Web of Science, were searched for published reviews. The search for unpublished and informally published reviews was further attempted in the last four databases. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2.

resultsTwelve included SRs assessed clinical studies published between 2014 and 2020, including a total of seventeen primary clinical trials. All SRs summarized data from individual studies and provided a narrative conclusion regarding the effectiveness of the adjunctive treatments. Only six SRs performed a meta-analysis (MA) of additional benefits of the adjunctive therapy for PIM, with results indicating no significant difference between the different treatment modalities. The overall confidence was adjudged ranging from critically low to low using AMSTAR 2 and significant additional benefits of any adjunctive treatments in comparison with NSMD were not apparent.

conclusionOverall, the reviewed evidence did not support the use of adjunctive treatments for improvement of clinical outcomes in PM management as compared to NSMD alone.

Indexed as

MucositisPeri-ImplantitisDental CareHumansMEDLINESystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35674882
PMCPMC9177933
OpenAlexW4281671990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.