Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35674829›Full record

Observational studyChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2022

A 10-year retrospective observational study on the utility and prescription standards of dexamethasone in pediatric neuro-oncosurgery in a tertiary care center.

Anutra Chumbala Na Ayudhaya, Scott R Morrison, Chandrasekaran Kaliaperumal, Pasquale Gallo

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Glucocorticoid use in paediatric posterior fossa tumour surgery and the occurrence of postoperative speech impairment.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anutra Chumbala Na AyudhayaThe University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, Scotland. natchumbala@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8012-1846
Scott R MorrisonNHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Chandrasekaran KaliaperumalConsultant Adult and Paediatric Neurosurgeon, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Pasquale GalloConsultant Adult and Paediatric Neurosurgeon, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland.
NHS Lothian · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectThis study aimed to retrospectively assess dexamethasone utility in pediatric CNS tumor patients over a 10-year period, to better understand dosing variability, and highlight optimal practice.

methodsAll pediatric CNS tumor cases managed operatively for a 10-year period at a single center were reviewed. Information was gathered on demographics, dexamethasone doses, course durations, weaning regimes, PPI co-prescription, adverse events, and route of administration. Comparison within these groups was analyzed through use of statistical testing.

resultsOne hundred twenty-seven patients received 193 dexamethasone courses. Median age was 7 years, with a median weight of 27.9 kg. Most common tumor type was astrocytoma (24.8%). Median daily dose was 8 mg, with twice-daily dosing most common. Median course duration was 8 days, ranging from 1 to 1103 days. Median weaning duration was 11.5 days. Daily dose was not correlated with patient weight and the median daily dose per kg was 0.2319 mg/kg. Incidence of adverse effects was 14.5% across all course lengths, with weight gain most common. The short-term course duration (<14 days) had the lowest adverse event incidence, with direct correlation between course length and adverse effect incidence. Dexamethasone dose per kg was not significantly different between patients with and without adverse effects. No relationship was noted between adverse effects incidence and administration route (intravenous compared to oral). 64.2% of patients received concurrent PPI with 35.8% receiving no PPI, with 1 gastrointestinal side effect noted in the PPI-receiving population.

conclusionsLarge variation was seen in practice, with prescriptions appearing based on clinician preference and symptom severity rather than patient age or weight. Future guidelines should consider lower dose regimens than are currently presented with less frequent dosing as these may benefit quality of life. Weaning period can be relatively rapid for most patients, taking place in 2-3 days. PPI co-prescription does not seem to add significant benefit. We recommend using a standardized guideline of 0.2 mg/kg/day (max 8 mg/day) given OD or BD, with PPI cover where necessary. For acute presentations, we recommend limiting dexamethasone treatment to <14 days. These recommendations can be adjusted for individual cases to yield optimal results.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeChildDexamethasoneHumansPrescriptionsRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersDexamethasoneCNS tumorsDexamethasoneGuidelinesNeurosurgeryOncologyPediatricStandardization

Identifiers

PMID35674829
PMCPMC9463277
OpenAlexW4282044791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.