Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35674801›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2022

The network of psychosocial health in middle-aged and older adults during the first COVID-19 lockdown.

Maud de Feijter, Desana Kocevska, Tessa F Blanken, Isabelle F van der Velpen, M Arfan Ikram, Annemarie I Luik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maud de FeijterDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Desana KocevskaDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tessa F BlankenDepartment of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Isabelle F van der VelpenDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M Arfan IkramDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Annemarie I LuikDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.luik@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7517-197X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePsychosocial health problems, such as social isolation, loneliness, depression and anxiety, have gained attention during the COVID-19 pandemic and are commonly co-occurring. We investigated the network of psychosocial health constructs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsThis study included 4553 participants (mean age: 68.6 ± 11.2 years, 56% women) from the prospective Rotterdam Study, who filled out a questionnaire between April and July 2020, the time of the first COVID-19 wave in the Netherlands. Psychosocial health constructs included were depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale), anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale), loneliness (University of California, Los Angeles loneliness scale), social connectedness (five items) and pandemic-related worry (five items). We estimated mixed graphical models to assess the network of items of these constructs and whether age and sex affected the network structure.

resultsWithin the network of psychosocial constructs, a higher depressive symptoms score was particularly associated with items of loneliness and social connectedness, whereas overall anxiety was particularly associated with items of pandemic-related worry. Between people from different sex and age, the network structure significantly altered.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that within the same network of psychosocial health constructs, depressive symptom score is particularly associated with loneliness and social connectedness, whereas anxiety symptom score is associated with pandemic-related worry during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Our results support that psychosocial constructs should be considered in conjunction with one another in prevention and treatment efforts in clinical care, and that these efforts need to be tailored to specific demographic groups.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedAnxietyCommunicable Disease ControlDepressionFemaleHumansLonelinessMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsProspective StudiesCOVID-19 pandemicLockdownMiddle-aged and elderlyNetwork analysesPopulation-basedPsychosocial health

Identifiers

PMID35674801
PMCPMC9174915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.