ReviewPediatric radiology2022
Pediatric mediastinal masses.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robot-Assisted Resection of Mediastinal Tumors in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Vasculature cast sign onEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- A retrospective clinical analysis of pediatric mediastinal space-occupying lesions in a Chinese children's hospital from 2015 to 2024.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparison of open, thoracoscopic, and robotic approaches for pediatric mediastinal tumor resection.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Surgical Management of a Giant Mediastinal Schwannoma Associated with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Surgical management of a huge mediastinal mature teratoma in a 2-year-old girl: a case report.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases · 2024Article
- Pediatric mediastinal lymphatic malformation: misdiagnosis analysis and literature review.BMC pediatrics · 2024Review
- The combination of maximum standardized uptake value and clinical parameters for improving the accuracy in distinguishing primary mediastinal lymphomas from thymic epithelial tumors.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mediastinal masses are categorized based on the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) classification into prevascular, visceral and paravertebral compartments. The schema is based on cross-sectional imaging, mainly CT, and helps with generating a differential diagnosis based on location of the mass. Up to half of all pediatric mediastinal tumors are malignant. In this review we describe mediastinal masses that are relevant to the pediatric population, as well as the role of MR imaging of mediastinal masses and its advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.