ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022
The paradox: guilt as an antidote to helplessness among oncologists.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast Cancer Patients' Parenting Concerns User Personas: A Qualitative Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Caring for terminally Ill patients: the impact on oncologists.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Behavioral Self-Blame in PTSD-Etiology, Risk Factors, and Proposed Interventions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOncologists are exposed to suffering, loss, and death, and as a result may experience guilt. The study examined two competing hypotheses regarding the relation between locus of control (LOC) and guilt among oncologists and the mediating role of helplessness.
methodEighty-three oncologists answered a demographic questionnaire; the Levenson's "Internal, Powerful Others, and Chance" scale; the Guilt Inventory; and the Learned Helplessness Scale.
resultsOncologists reported moderate levels of guilt, high levels of internal LOC, and low levels of external LOC and helplessness. The results indicate a significant negative relationship between internal LOC and guilt and a significant positive relationship between external LOC (powerful others) and guilt, both mediated by helplessness. It seems that oncologists with external LOC feel helplessness and this metamorphoses into guilt, due to its potentially protective role against feelings of helplessness.
conclusionsOncologists are at risk for guilt. Whereas an internal LOC plays an important role as a resilience factor in terms of helplessness, an external LOC is a risk factor for helplessness and guilt. A paradoxical association between guilt and helplessness was found. The implication of which is that guilt may be produced to avoid helplessness; in other words, guilt, however painful, might be preferable to feeling helpless. Interventions focusing on oncologists' coping with uncontrolled situations in their daily work, decreasing their sense of helplessness and guilt, should be implanted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.