Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35674772›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

Anatomic reconstruction using the autologous gracilis tendon achieved less sprain recurrence than the Broström-Gould procedure but delayed recovery in chronic lateral ankle instability.

Tong Su, Yi-Chuan Zhu, Ming-Ze Du, Yan-Fang Jiang, Qin-Wei Guo, Yue-Lin Hu, Chen Jiao, Dong Jiang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tong Su *Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, No.49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yi-Chuan Zhu *Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, No.49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ming-Ze DuDepartment of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, No.49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yan-Fang JiangDepartment of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, No.49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Qin-Wei GuoDepartment of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, No.49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yue-Lin HuDepartment of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, No.49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Chen JiaoDepartment of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, No.49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China. jiaoshuj@tsinghua.edu.cn.
Dong JiangDepartment of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, No.49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China. bysyjiangdong@126.com.
Peking University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

Key Clinical Projects of Peking University Third Hospital Y72484-02National Key R&D Program of China 2019YFB1706900National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072428Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 7212132Peking University Medicine Seed Fund for Interdisciplinary Research BMU2020MX020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the return-to-activity and long-term clinical outcomes between anatomic lateral ligament reconstruction using the autologous gracilis tendon and modified Broström-Gould (MBG) procedure in chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). It was hypothesised that there was no difference between the two techniques.

methodsFrom 2013 to 2018, 30 CLAI patients with grade III joint instability confirmed by anterior drawer test underwent anatomic reconstruction of lateral ankle ligament with the autologous gracilis tendon (reconstruction group) in our institute. Another 30 patients undergoing MBG procedure (MBG group) were matched in a 1:1 ratio based on demographic parameters. The post-operative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, Tegner activity score, Karlsson-Peterson score, surgical complications, return-to-activities and work were retrospectively evaluated and compared between the two groups.

resultsAll subjective scores significantly improved after the operation (all with p < 0.001) without difference between the two groups (all n.s.). The MBG group showed a significantly higher proportion of postoperative sprain recurrence than the reconstruction group (26.7% vs. 0, p = 0.002). The reconstruction group showed a significantly longer period to start walking with full weight-bearing (10.5 ± 6.9 vs. 7.0 ± 3.1 weeks, p = 0.015), jogging (17.1 ± 8.9 vs. 12.7 ± 6.9 weeks, p = 0.043) and return-to-work (13.5 ± 12.6 vs. 8.0 ± 4.7 weeks, p = 0.039) than the MBG group.

conclusionsBoth anatomic reconstruction using the autologous gracilis tendon and MBG procedure could equally achieved reliable long-term clinical outcomes and the tendon reconstruction showed a relatively lower incidence of postoperative sprain recurrence but delayed recovery to walking, jogging and return-to-work. The MBG procedure was still the first choice with rapid recovery but the tendon reconstruction was recommended for patients with higher strength demand. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityLateral Ligament, AnkleSprains and StrainsAnkleAnkle JointHumansRetrospective StudiesTendonsAnatomic ankle ligament reconstructionBroström-Gould procedureChronic ankle instabilityReturn to play

Identifiers

PMID35674772
OpenAlexW4282944423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.