Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35674706›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical engineering & technology2022

Design considerations for piezocomposite materials for electrical stimulation in medical implants.

Ember Krech, Evan Haas, Grace Tideman, Bonnie Reinsch, Elizabeth Friis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical engineering & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ember KrechBioengineering Graduate Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Evan HaasDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Grace TidemanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Bonnie ReinschDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Elizabeth FriisBioengineering Graduate Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.

Funding

Development of an Osteoinductive Spinal Fusion Implant for Enhanced Fusion RatesR41AR070088 · NIAMS · EVOKE MEDICAL, LLC · PI FRIIS, ELIZABETH A · 2016 to 2016
$225k
NIAMS NIH HHS R41 AR070088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incidence of non-union following long bone fracture fixation and spinal fusion procedures is increasing, and very costly for patients and the medical system. Direct current (DC) electrical stimulation has shown success as an adjunct therapy to stimulate bone healing and increase surgery success rates, though drawbacks of current devices and implantable battery packs have limited widespread use. Energy harvesting utilising piezoelectric materials has been widely studied for powering devices without a battery, and a preclinical animal study has shown efficacy of a piezocomposite spinal fusion implant resulting in faster, more robust fusion. Most piezoelectric energy harvesters operate most effectively at high frequencies, limiting power generation from loads experienced by orthopaedic implants during human motion. This work characterises the efficient power generation capability of a novel composite piezoelectric material under simulated walking loads. Building on compliant layer adaptive composite stacks (CLACS), the power generation of mixed-mode CLACS (MMCLACS) is defined. Utilising poling direction to capitalise on in-plane strain generation due to compliant layer expansion, MMCLACS significantly increased power output compared to a standard piezo stack. The combination of radial and through-thickness poled piezoelectric elements within a stack to create MMCLACS significantly increases power generation under low-frequency dynamic loads. This technology can be adapted to a variety of architectures and assembled as a load-bearing energy harvester within current implants. MMCLACS integrated with implants would provide enough power to deliver bone healing electrical stimulation directly to the fusion site, decreasing non-union rates, and also could provide quantitative assessment of healing progression through load sensing.

Indexed as

Electric Power SuppliesProstheses and ImplantsAnimalsElectric StimulationWeight-BearingWound HealingBioelectric energy sourceselectrical stimulationfracture healingsensing materialssmart materialsspinal fusion

Identifiers

PMID35674706
PMCPMC10262080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.