ArticleMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2022
Lesion size and shape in central vein sign assessment for multiple sclerosis diagnosis: An in vivo and postmortem MRI study.
Article in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Expert Panel Consensus Guidelines of the German Society of Neuroradiology on the Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Multiple Sclerosis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Guideline
- Comparison of central FLAIR hypointensity and central vein sign on FLAIR* in a diagnostic cohort.European journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of central vein sign versus oligoclonal bands for multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2024Article
- Reply.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: what has changed in diagnostic criteria?Polish journal of radiology · 2023Review
- A Novel Convolutional Neural Network for Automated Multiple Sclerosis Brain Lesion Segmentation.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingReview
- Paramagnetic rim lesions and the central vein sign: Characterizing multiple sclerosis imaging markers.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe "central vein sign" (CVS), a linear hypointensity on T2*-weighted imaging corresponding to a central vein/venule, is associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. The effect of lesion-size exclusion criteria on MS diagnostic accuracy has not been extensively studied.
objectiveInvestigate the optimal lesion-size exclusion criteria for CVS use in MS diagnosis.
methodsCross-sectional study of 163 MS and 51 non-MS, and radiological/histopathological correlation of 5 MS and 1 control autopsy cases. The effects of lesion-size exclusion on MS diagnosis using the CVS, and intralesional vein detection on histopathology were evaluated.
resultsCVS+ lesions were larger compared to CVS- lesions, with effect modification by MS diagnosis (mean difference +7.7 mm
conclusionLesion-size measures add important information when using CVS+ lesion counts for MS diagnosis. The CVS is a specific biomarker corresponding to intralesional veins on histopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.