ReviewLab on a chip2022
Advancing microfluidic diagnostic chips into clinical use: a review of current challenges and opportunities.
Review in Lab on a chip, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfluidics for Blood Disorders and Hematological Disease Monitoring and Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Biomaterials for biomarker imaging and detection.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Article
- Applying microfluidic technology to interpret the tumor immune microenvironment and cancer immunotherapy.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Review
- Peptide Arrays as Tools for Unraveling Tumor Microenvironments and Drug Discovery in Oncology.Cells · 2026Review
- Rolling Circle Amplification as a Molecular Tool for Spatially Resolved Signal Amplification in Single Molecule Counting Assay.Biosensors · 2025Review
- 4D-printed microdevices for spatiotemporal detection of ctDNA and miRNA in pancreatic cancer: an in-depth review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Recent Advancements in Metal-Organic Framework-Based Microfluidic Chips for Biomedical Applications.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Combining time domain modulation optofluidics and high dynamic range imaging for multiplexed, high throughput digital droplet assays.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- Review
- Virtual reality-enhanced rehabilitation for improving musculoskeletal function and recovery after trauma.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Review
- Evaluation of 3D-Printed Microfluidic Structures for Use in AML-Specific Biomarker Detection of PML::RARA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Microfluidics for the biological analysis of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles: Perspectives and challenges.Biomicrofluidics · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in the Fabrication and Application of Electrochemical Paper-Based Analytical Devices.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Microfluidic 3D Cytotoxic Assay.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Label-free approaches for extracellular vesicle detection.iScience · 2023Review
- Brain-derived extracellular vesicles as serologic markers of brain injury following cardiac arrest: A pilot feasibility study.Resuscitation · 2023Article
- iCLOTS: open-source, artificial intelligence-enabled software for analyses of blood cells in microfluidic and microscopy-based assays.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Assessment of stored red blood cells through lab-on-a-chip technologies for precision transfusion medicine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Proteomics Methodologies: The Search of Protein Biomarkers Using Microfluidic Systems Coupled to Mass Spectrometry.Proteomes · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidic diagnostic (μDX) technologies miniaturize sensors and actuators to the length-scales that are relevant to biology: the micrometer scale to interact with cells and the nanometer scale to interrogate biology's molecular machinery. This miniaturization allows measurements of biomarkers of disease (cells, nanoscale vesicles, molecules) in clinical samples that are not detectable using conventional technologies. There has been steady progress in the field over the last three decades, and a recent burst of activity catalyzed by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this time, an impressive and ever-growing set of technologies have been successfully validated in their ability to measure biomarkers in clinical samples, such as blood and urine, with sensitivity and specificity not possible using conventional tests. Despite our field's many accomplishments to date, very few of these technologies have been successfully commercialized and brought to clinical use where they can fulfill their promise to improve medical care. In this paper, we identify three major technological trends in our field that we believe will allow the next generation of μDx to have a major impact on the practice of medicine, and which present major opportunities for those entering the field from outside disciplines: 1. the combination of next generation, highly multiplexed μDx technologies with machine learning to allow complex patterns of multiple biomarkers to be decoded to inform clinical decision points, for which conventional biomarkers do not necessarily exist. 2. The use of micro/nano devices to overcome the limits of binding affinity in complex backgrounds in both the detection of sparse soluble proteins and nucleic acids in blood and rare circulating extracellular vesicles. 3. A suite of recent technologies that obviate the manual pre-processing and post-processing of samples before they are measured on a μDX chip. Additionally, we discuss economic and regulatory challenges that have stymied μDx translation to the clinic, and highlight strategies for successfully navigating this challenging space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.