Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35674048›Full record

ArticleCulture, health & sexuality2023

Balancing risk, intimacy and (non)compliance: a qualitative study of sex across household during COVID-19 social restrictions.

Karen J Maxwell, Raquel Bosó Pérez, David Reid, Lily Freeman, Dee Menezes, Pam Sonnenberg, Nigel Field, Kirstin R Mitchell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Culture, health & sexuality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen J MaxwellMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2264-6510
Raquel Bosó PérezMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7342-4566
David ReidInstitute of Global Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6832-2418
Lily FreemanInstitute of Global Health, UCL, London, UK.
Dee MenezesInstitute of Health Informatics, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1628-1228
Pam SonnenbergInstitute of Global Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1067-1583
Nigel FieldInstitute of Global Health, UCL, London, UK.
Kirstin R MitchellMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4409-6601
University College London · GBMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU18Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/3Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 212931/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Government controls over intimate relationships, imposed to limit the spread of Sars-CoV-2, were unprecedented in modern times. This study draws on data from qualitative interviews with 18 participants in Natsal-COVID, a quasi-representative web-panel survey of the British population (

Indexed as

COVID-19Sexual PartnersHumansMotivationQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2COVID-19pandemic restrictionsrisk behavioursexual behaviour

Identifiers

PMID35674048
PMCPMC10184729
OpenAlexW4281678175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.