ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2022
The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on changes in antimicrobial prophylaxis and development of genito-urinary tract infections after urodynamic study: A retrospective comparative study of a single rehabilitation hospital in Japan.
Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on changes in antimicrobial prophylaxis and development of genito-urinary tract infections after urodynamic study: A retrospective comparative study of a single rehabilitation hospital in Japan.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo investigate the changes in the proportion of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) during the urodynamic study (UDS) and the frequency of posttest genito-urinary tract infections (GUTI) before and after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and evaluate this associations. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients who underwent UDS between 2015 and 2021 were targeted, and they were allocated to pre-2020 as before the appearance of COVID-19 and post-2020 as after that, and propensity score matching was performed. The impact on AP was assessed by the administration rate, and that on the development of febrile GUTI after UDS was assessed for an equivalence by the GUTI-free rate at 7 days after testing.
resultsAfter matching, 384 cases of 192 cases each were included. The frequency of AP was 58.3% in pre-2020 and 77.1% in post-2020, an increase of about 19%, and the rate increased significantly in post-2020 (p < 0.001). However, the incidence of GUTI after UDS was 4.2% and 4.7%, respectively, with no significant difference. The ratio of GUTI-free rates was within the equivalence margin, confirming an equivalence before and after the appearance of COVID-19.
conclusionsUnder the influence of COVID-19 pandemic, even though AP rate during UDS was increased by 19% from that brought by following the guideline-based administration methods, the frequency of GUTI after UDS was similar, so it is thought to be important to use AP during UDS appropriately for high-risk cases as recommended in the guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.