Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35673861›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Biodiversity underpins fisheries resilience to exploitation in the Amazon river basin.

Sebastian A Heilpern, Suresh A Sethi, Ronaldo B Barthem, Vandick da Silva Batista, Carolina R C Doria, Fabrice Duponchelle, Aurea García Vasquez, Michael Goulding, Victoria Isaac, Shahid Naeem and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Commercially traded fish portfolios mask household utilization of biodiversity in wild food systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sebastian A HeilpernDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8673-3149
Suresh A SethiU.S. Geological Survey, New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Ronaldo B BarthemMuseu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Pará, Brazil.
Vandick da Silva BatistaInstituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceio, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1183-1067
Carolina R C DoriaDepartamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Rondônia, Porto Velho, Brazil.
Fabrice DuponchelleLaboratoire Mixte International - Evolution et Domestication de l'Ichtyofaune Amazonienne (LMI - EDIA), IIAP - UAGRM - IRD, Montpellier, France.
Aurea García VasquezLaboratoire Mixte International - Evolution et Domestication de l'Ichtyofaune Amazonienne (LMI - EDIA), IIAP - UAGRM - IRD, Montpellier, France.
Michael GouldingWildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY, USA.
Victoria IsaacNúcleo de Ecologia Aquática e Pesca da Amazônia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Brazil.
Shahid NaeemDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6569-2648
Alexander S FleckerDeparment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inland fisheries feed greater than 150 million people globally, yet their status is rarely assessed due to their socio-ecological complexity and pervasive lack of data. Here, we leverage an unprecedented landings time series from the Amazon, Earth's largest river basin, together with theoretical food web models to examine (i) taxonomic and trait-based signatures of exploitation in inland fish landings and (ii) implications of changing biodiversity for fisheries resilience. In both landings time series and theory, we find that multi-species exploitation of diverse inland fisheries results in a hump-shaped landings evenness curve. Along this trajectory, abundant and large species are sequentially replaced with faster growing and smaller species. Further theoretical analysis indicates that harvests can be maintained for a period of time but that continued biodiversity depletion reduces the pool of compensating species and consequently diminishes fisheries resilience. Critically, higher fisheries biodiversity can delay fishery collapse. Although existing landings data provide an incomplete snapshot of long-term dynamics, our results suggest that multi-species exploitation is affecting freshwater biodiversity and eroding fisheries resilience in the Amazon. More broadly, we conclude that trends in landings evenness could characterize multi-species fisheries development and aid in assessing their sustainability.

Indexed as

FisheriesRiversAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFishesHumansAmazondata-limitedecological modellingecosystem managementfood websmulti-species

Identifiers

PMID35673861
PMCPMC9174703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.