Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35673702›Full record

ReviewASN neuro

GFAP Alternative Splicing and the Relevance for Disease - A Focus on Diffuse Gliomas.

Jessy V van Asperen, Pierre A J T Robe, Elly M Hol

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ASN neuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Alexander disease: the road ahead.Neural regeneration research · 2023
    Review
  20. Proteomics Analysis of R-Ras Deficiency in Oxygen Induced Retinopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessy V van AsperenDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, 526115University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pierre A J T RobeDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, 526115University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elly M HolDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, 526115University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5604-2603
Utrecht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an intermediate filament protein that is characteristic for astrocytes and neural stem cells, and their malignant analogues in glioma. Since the discovery of the protein 50 years ago, multiple alternative splice variants of the GFAP gene have been discovered, leading to different GFAP isoforms. In this review, we will describe GFAP isoform expression from gene to protein to network, taking the canonical isoforms GFAPα and the main alternative variant GFAPδ as the starting point. We will discuss the relevance of studying GFAP and its isoforms in disease, with a specific focus on diffuse gliomas.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingGliomaAstrocytesGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansIntermediate FilamentsProtein IsoformsGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinProtein IsoformsastrocytecytoskeletonGFAPgliagliomasplicing

Identifiers

PMID35673702
PMCPMC9185002
OpenAlexW4282941390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.