Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35673694›Full record

ReviewCytoJournal2022

Atypical glandular cells (AGC): Cytology of glandular lesions of the uterine cervix.

Mir Yousufuddin Ali Khan, Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay, Ahmed Alrajjal, Moumita Saha Roy Choudhury, Rouba Ali-Fehmi, Vinod B Shidham

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CytoJournal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells on cytology: 10 years' experience of a colposcopic referral center.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2025
    Article
  6. Trouble-makers in cytologic interpretation of the uterine cervix.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mir Yousufuddin Ali KhanDepartments of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, and Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Sudeshna BandyopadhyayDepartments of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, and Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Ahmed AlrajjalDepartments of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, and Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Moumita Saha Roy ChoudhuryDepartments of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, and Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Rouba Ali-FehmiDepartments of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, and Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Vinod B ShidhamDepartments of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, and Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Wayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pap smear is a well-known screening tool for squamous lesions of the uterine cervix. However, its screening role in glandular lesions is less effective. The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix has dramatically decreased with the advent of Pap smear and recent understanding related to HPV carcinogenesis of cervical cancers including the advent of HPV vaccines. However, in recent years, the incidence of glandular abnormalities, diagnosed on Pap smears, has increased with greater sensitivity and precision. The incidence of atypical glandular cells (AGC) is approximately 0.18-0.74% of all cervical smears with a reported prevalence of 2.5% among all Pap smears. A high degree of suspicion, good clinical history, and the presence of diagnostic cytomorphological findings are essential for the proper interpretation of glandular cell abnormalities. A methodical approach to evaluate Pap smear greatly helps interpretation and avoids the diagnostic pitfalls. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology has categorized glandular cell abnormalities into various categories as follows: Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)Atypical glandular cells (AGCs) Endocervical cells: a1 NOS or specify in comments; a2 Favor neoplasticEndometrial cells: NOS or specify in comments Adenocarcinoma (AdCa) EndocervicalEndometrialExtrauterineNOS Subtle differences in quantitative and qualitative cytologic features are essential for distinguishing one category from another. In this chapter, we highlight an organized approach for the interpretation of glandular abnormalities in Pap smear for our readers. This is an overview of the Bethesda categories, the reason for classification, and differential diagnosis with key characteristic features. An approach to the methodical evaluation of hyperchromatic crowded groups is discussed with key cytomorphologic differences. An algorithmic approach is suggested to facilitate the interpretation of various AGC categories.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma in situAGCAISAtypical glandular cellsCancerCervical cytologyEndocervixEndometrialHCGHPVHyperchromatic crowded groupsScreening

Identifiers

PMID35673694
PMCPMC9168395
OpenAlexW4225141737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.