Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35673638›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2022

Carotid endarterectomy with stent removal for recurring in-stent restenosis: A case report and literature review.

Yuichi Takahashi, Tetsuhiro Higashida, Takanori Uchida, Saiko Watanabe, Ryuzaburo Kanazawa

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuichi TakahashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagareyama Central Hospital, Nagareyama City, Japan.
Tetsuhiro HigashidaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagareyama Central Hospital, Nagareyama City, Japan.
Takanori UchidaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagareyama Central Hospital, Nagareyama City, Japan.
Saiko WatanabeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagareyama Central Hospital, Nagareyama City, Japan.
Ryuzaburo KanazawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagareyama Central Hospital, Nagareyama City, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous transcatheter angioplasty (PTA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are often performed repeatedly for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after CAS. Only a few reports describe the treatment for repeated ISR. Furthermore, only a few reports describe carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after CAS; thus, the evidence for this procedure is insufficient. Case Description: Herein, we describe a case in which CEA with stent removal was performed in a patient with repeated ISR after CAS. A 78-year-old man presented with dysarthria and slight left limb weakness. CAS was performed for the right internal carotid artery stenosis. ISR occurred again and PTA and stenting were performed. After the second CAS, ISR occurred again. CEA with stent removal was performed. After the CEA with stent removal, the patient experienced no restenosis or other complications. Conclusion: CEA with stent removal can be a good option for treating repeated ISR after CAS.

Indexed as

Carotid artery stentCarotid endarterectomyIn-stent restenosisInternal carotid artery stenosisNeointimal hyperplasia

Identifiers

PMID35673638
PMCPMC9168307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.