ArticleHorticulture research2022
An efficient CRISPR/Cas9 system for simultaneous editing two target sites in
Article in Horticulture research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study on Genetic Transformation System of Cabbage (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of carotenoid biosynthesis genes alters carotenoid concentrations in kiwifruit.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- The long non-coding RNA MSTRG.32189-PcmiR399b-Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Two TAL effectors of Xanthomonas citri promote pustule formation by directly repressing the expression of GRAS transcription factor in citrus.Molecular horticulture · 2025Article
- From resistance to remedy: the role of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats system in combating antimicrobial resistance-a review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Genome editing for grass improvement and future agriculture.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- An efficient multiplex approach to CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in citrus.Plant methods · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a revolutionary genome editing technique and has been widely used in numerous plants. For plants (e.g. citrus) with very low transformation efficiency, how to optimize gene editing efficiency and induce large-fragment deletion has been the focus of research. Here, we report that CRISPR/Cas9 induces efficient deletion of 16-673 bp fragments in the genome of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.