ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2022
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expanding access to maggot containment dressings through redesign and innovation.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Larval Wound Therapy: Possibilities and Potential Limitations-A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Wounds with dead tissue, purulent wounds, and gangrene are good options for larval therapy. We aim to investigate the effect of larval therapy on diabetic wounds and compare it with traditional treatment. Methods: The sterile larvae were used in wound treatment and the infection rate, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and wound size were measured and compared before and after the treatment. Results: The scars of 40 patients in the larval therapy group were evaluated every 10 days and the mean size of the scar decreased from 38.5 cm (36.6 cm) before treatment to 5.0 cm (6.6 cm) after 60 days. ESR mean was decreased from 57.3 (18.3) before treatment to 15.8 (4.8) after treatment in the larval therapy group. These parameters were significantly decreased compared to the debridement group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Larval therapy is effective in diabetic wound healing. The size of the wound after larval treatment is smaller than before. There was no difference between the two groups for infection rate. ESR was significantly decreased in the larval therapy group that indicating the lower inflammation in this group. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-022-00973-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.