Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35673418›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2022

Performance analysis and prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus based on lifestyle data using machine learning approaches.

Shahid Mohammad Ganie, Majid Bashir Malik, Tasleem Arif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Machine Learning Models for Data-Driven Prediction of Diabetes by Lifestyle Type.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shahid Mohammad GanieDepartment of Computer Sciences, BGSB University, UT J&K, Rajouri, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9925-0402
Majid Bashir MalikDepartment of Computer Sciences, BGSB University, UT J&K, Rajouri, India.
Tasleem ArifDepartment of Information Technology, BGSB University, UT J&K, Rajouri, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6076-289X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Diabetes is a chronic fatal disease that has affected millions of people all over the globe. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) accounts for 90% of the affected population among all types of diabetes. Millions of T2DM patients remain undiagnosed due to lack of awareness and under resourced healthcare system. So, there is a dire need for a diagnostic and prognostic tool that shall help the healthcare providers, clinicians and practitioners with early prediction and hence can recommend the lifestyle changes required to stop the progression of diabetes. The main objective of this research is to develop a framework based on machine learning techniques using only lifestyle indicators for prediction of T2DM disease. Moreover, prediction model can be used without visiting clinical labs and hospital readmissions. Method: A proposed framework is presented and implemented based on machine learning paradigms using lifestyle indicators for better prediction of T2DM disease. The current research has involved different experts like Diabetologists, Endocrinologists, Dieticians, Nutritionists, etc. for selecting the contributing 1552 instances and 11 attributes lifestyle biological features to promote health and manage complications towards T2DM disease. The dataset has been collected through survey and google forms from different geographical regions. Results: Seven machine learning classifiers were employed namely K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Linear Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting (GB). Gradient Boosting classifier outperformed best with an accuracy rate of 97.24% for training and 96.90% for testing separately followed by RF, DT, NB, SVM, LR, and KNN as 95.36%, 92.52%, 90.72%, 90.20%, 90.20% and 77.06% respectively. However, in terms of precision, RF achieved high performance (0.980%) and KNN performed the lowest (0.793%). As far as recall is being concerned, GB achieved the highest rate of 0.975% and KNN showed the worst rate of 0.774%. Also, GB is top performed in terms of f1-score. According to the ROCs, GB and NB had a better area under the curve compared to the others. Conclusion: The research developed a realistic health management system for T2DM disease based on machine learning techniques using only lifestyle data for prediction of T2DM. To extend the current study, these models shall be used for different, large and real-time datasets which share the commonality of data with T2DM disease to establish the efficacy of the proposed system.

Indexed as

Diabetes predictionensemble learning modeljupyter notebookmachine learning algorithmsType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID35673418
PMCPMC9167316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.