ArticleCrystal growth & design2022
Secondary Nucleation by Interparticle Energies. III. Nucleation Rate Model.
Article in Crystal growth & design, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluid shear driven secondary nucleation using α-and γ-glycine seeds confirmed with rigorous control experiments.CrystEngComm · 2026Article
- Conceptual Validation of Stochastic and Deterministic Methods To Estimate Crystal Nucleation Rates.Crystal growth & design · 2023Article
- Secondary Nucleation by Interparticle Energies. II. Kinetics.Crystal growth & design · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A nucleation rate model for describing the kinetics of secondary nucleation caused by interparticle energies (SNIPEs) is derived theoretically, verified numerically, and validated experimentally. The theoretical derivation reveals that the SNIPE mechanism can be viewed as enhanced primary nucleation, i.e., primary nucleation with a lower thermodynamic energy barrier (for nucleation) and a smaller critical nucleus size, both caused by the interparticle interactions and the associated energy between the surface of a seed crystal and a molecular cluster in solution, as shown in part I of this series. In the case of a sufficiently agitated suspension, the model depends on four parameters: two reflecting primary nucleation kinetics and the other two accounting for the intensity and effective spatial range of the interparticle interactions. As a numerical verification of the model, we show that the nucleation kinetics described by the SNIPE rate model is in quantitative agreement with those given by the kinetic rate equation model developed in part II of this series. A sensitivity analysis of the SNIPE rate model is conducted to present the effect of key model parameters on the nucleation kinetics. Moreover, the SNIPE rate model is validated by fitting the model to the time-resolved data of secondary nucleation experiments as well as to two other, well-known secondary nucleation rate models. Importantly, all of the estimated parameter values for the SNIPE model were consistent with the theoretical estimates, while some of the estimated parameter values for one of the well-known secondary nucleation models deviated from the corresponding theoretical values significantly.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.