Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35673343›Full record

ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2022

Detecting Patent Foramen Ovale after Cryptogenic Stroke - A Single Center Experience in Taiwan.

Ting-Yu Lin, Yun-Ching Fu, Sheng-Ling Jan, Ming-Chih Lin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ting-Yu LinChildren's Medical Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Yun-Ching FuChildren's Medical Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Sheng-Ling JanChildren's Medical Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Ming-Chih LinChildren's Medical Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Taichung Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Chung Hsing University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cryptogenic strokes related to a patent foramen ovale (PFO) in young patients have been reported. Percutaneous transcatheter occlusion is considered a safe and effective method for achieving PFO closure. Here, we present our experience of PFO closure in a series of young patients diagnosed with cryptogenic stroke. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 62 patients who were younger than 60 years of age and previously diagnosed with cryptogenic stroke. They underwent cardiac catheterization for the diagnosis of PFO and/or device closure. Bubble and echocardiography studies, the patients' characteristics, complications, and recurrence of stroke were recorded. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score index was also calculated. Results: Patients with a bubble study grade greater than grade I were likely to have PFO (odds ratio: 22.2 [95% confidence interval: 1.2-412.3]). The mean RoPE score in the PFO closure group was 7.18. Two patients (3.9%) developed atrial fibrillation during the procedure. Ischemic stroke recurred in two patients (3.3%). Conclusions: Combining a bubble study with transcranial Doppler ultrasound or transthoracic echocardiography may increase the validity of PFO diagnosis. Because of the low recurrence rate of stroke and low complication rate, it is important to identify PFO patients with a bubble study grade greater than grade I. Closure of PFO may be a good strategy for preventing recurrent stroke among such patients.

Indexed as

Bubble studyCryptogenic strokePatent foramen ovaleRoPE score index

Identifiers

PMID35673343
PMCPMC9121751
OpenAlexW4282925411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.