Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35673325›Full record

ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2022

Individual Differences in Hemispheric Emotional Valence by Computerized Test Correlate with Lateralized Differences in Nucleus Accumbens, Hippocampal and Amygdala Volumes.

Fredric Schiffer, Alaptagin Khan, Kyoko Ohashi, Laura C Hernandez Garcia, Carl M Anderson, Lisa D Nickerson, Martin H Teicher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fredric SchifferDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1904-3161
Alaptagin KhanDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kyoko OhashiDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Laura C Hernandez GarciaDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Carl M AndersonDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lisa D NickersonDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Martin H TeicherDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · US

Funding

Early Stress, Sensitive Periods and the Neurobiology of AddictionR01DA017846 · NIDA · MC LEAN HOSPITAL (BELMONT, MA) · PI TEICHER, MARTIN H · 2004 to 2024
$9.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Conventional theories of hemispheric emotional valence (HEV) postulate fixed hemispheric differences in emotional processing. Schiffer's dual brain psychology proposes that there are prominent individual differences with a substantial subset showing a reversed laterality pattern. He further proposed that hemispheric differences were more akin to differences in personality than in emotional processing. This theory is supported by findings that unilateral treatments, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, are effective if they accurately target individual differences in laterality. The aim of this paper was to assess if a computer test of hemispheric emotional valence (CTHEV) could effectively identify individual differences in HEV and to ascertain if these individual differences were associated with underlying differences in brain structure and connectivity. Patients and Methods: The CTHEV was administered to 50 (18 male/32 female) right-handed participants, aged 18-19 years, enrolled in a study assessing the neurobiological effects of childhood maltreatment. Based on a literature review, we determined whether CTHEV correlated with lateralized volumes of the nucleus accumbens, amygdala, hippocampus, and subgenual anterior cingulate as well as volume of the corpus callosum. Results: CTHEV scores correlated with laterality indices of the nucleus accumbens (p = 0.00016), amygdala (p = 0.0138) and hippocampus (p = 0.031). A positive left hemispheric valence was associated with a larger left-sided nucleus accumbens and hippocampus and a smaller left amygdala. We identified four eigenvector network centrality DTI measures that predict CTHEV, most notably the left amygdala, and found that CTHEV results correlated with total and segment-specific corpus callosal volumes. Conclusion: Individual differences in HEV can be readily assessed by computer test and correlate with differences in brain structure and connectivity that could provide a mechanistic understanding. These findings provide further support for a revised understanding of HEV and provide a tool that could be used to guide lateralized brain treatments.

Indexed as

brain structurecerebral lateralitycorpus callosumDual-Brain Psychologypersonality

Identifiers

PMID35673325
PMCPMC9167593
OpenAlexW4281750439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.