ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2022
Medical Scribes Have a Variable Impact on Documentation Workflows.
Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Scribes in Health Care: A Systematic Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Emerging Domains for Measuring Health Care Delivery With Electronic Health Record Metadata.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Review
- Virtual Scribes and Physician Time Spent on Electronic Health Records.JAMA network open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physicians can reduce their documentation time by working with a scribe. However, what scribes document and how their actions affect existing documentation workflows is unclear. This study leverages electronic health record (EHR) audit logs to observe how scribes affected the documentation workflows of seven physicians and their staff across 13,000 outpatient ophthalmology visits. In addition to editing progress notes, scribes routinely edited exam findings and diagnoses. Scribes with clinical training also edited items such as vital signs that a scribe without clinical training did not. Every physician edited patient records later in the day when working with a scribe and those who deferred their editing the most had some of the largest reductions in EHR time. These results suggest that what scribes document, how physicians work with scribes, and scribe impact on documentation time are all highly variable, highlighting the need for evidence-based best practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.