Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35672838›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2022

Does the addition of whole-body MRI to routine imaging influence real-world treatment decisions in metastatic breast cancer?

Basrull N Bhaludin, Nina Tunariu, Nishanthi Senthivel, Amna Babiker, Neil D Soneji, Nabil Hujairi, Bhupinder Sharma, Sophie E McGrath, Alicia F Okines, Alistair E Ring and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Imaging in metastatic breast cancer, CT, PET/CT, MRI, WB-DWI, CCA: review and new perspectives.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Basrull N BhaludinDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, England, UK. basrull.bhaludin@rmh.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8266-1846
Nina TunariuDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK.
Nishanthi SenthivelDepartment of Medicine - Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK.
Amna BabikerDepartment of Medicine - Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK.
Neil D SonejiDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, England, UK.
Nabil HujairiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, England, UK.
Bhupinder SharmaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, England, UK.
Sophie E McGrathDepartment of Medicine - Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK.
Alicia F OkinesDepartment of Medicine - Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, England, UK.
Alistair E RingDepartment of Medicine - Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK.
Christina MessiouDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK.
Kate Downey *Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, England, UK.
Dow-Mu Koh *Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, England, UK.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) can be limited with routine imaging such as computed tomography (CT) especially in bone-only or bone-predominant disease. This analysis investigates the effects of the use of WBMRI in addition to the use of routine CT, bone scintigraphy (BS) and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on influencing systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) decisions in patients with known MBC.

methodsMBC patients undergoing SACT who had WBMRI undertaken within 8 weeks of either a routine CT, BS or FDG-PET/CT were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical indications for undertaking the WBMRI examinations were recorded. Data on the extent and distribution of the disease were collected and discordance/concordance of disease status across the imaging modalities were compared. SACT decisions at each time point were also evaluated.

resultsThere were 105 MBC patients with 148 WBMRI studies paired with CT, BS or FDG-PET/CT. 50 pairs (33.8%) showed differences in the extent of disease, with 44 pairs due to additional sites (AS) reported on WBMRI alone. 81 patients (Group 1) had one WBMRI paired with routine imaging due to a variety of indications, with clinical symptoms (such as bone pain) being the most common (24.7%). 24 patients (Group 2) had more than one WBMRI study paired with routine imaging comprising 67 pairs. 13/67 pairs (19.4%) showed discordance in assessments. 10/13 pairs had progressive disease (PD) reported on WBMRI alone. SACT change due to AS reported on WBMRI alone occurred in 21/23 pairs (91.3%) in Group 1. SACT change due to PD reported on WBMRI alone in Group 2 occurred in 6/14 pairs (42.9%). SACT change due to AS/PD in both groups occurred in 11/102 pairs (10.8%) with known invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and 13/28 pairs (46.4%) with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC).

conclusionsThe use of WBMRI in MBC led to earlier recognition of PD and SACT change compared with the other imaging modalities. A higher proportion of discordant response assessments and SACT changes were observed in ILC compared with IDC in our patient group, although larger-scale studies are required to investigate this further.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18FemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesWhole Body ImagingFluorodeoxyglucose F18Cancer treatmentDiffusion-weighted imagingMetastatic breast cancerResponse assessmentWhole-body magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID35672838
PMCPMC9172188
OpenAlexW4281730020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.