Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35672835›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2022

Pharmacological affinity fingerprints derived from bioactivity data for the identification of designer drugs.

Kedan He

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Scipion-Chem: An Open Platform for Virtual Drug Screening.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kedan HePhysical Sciences, Eastern Connecticut State University, 83 Windham St, Willimantic, CT, 06226, USA. hek@easternct.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1953-4956

Funding

National Science Foundation CHE-1229354National Science Foundation CHE-1662030National Science Foundation CHE-2018427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facing the continuous emergence of new psychoactive substances (NPS) and their threat to public health, more effective methods for NPS prediction and identification are critical. In this study, the pharmacological affinity fingerprints (Ph-fp) of NPS compounds were predicted by Random Forest classification models using bioactivity data from the ChEMBL database. The binary Ph-fp is the vector consisting of a compound's activity against a list of molecular targets reported to be responsible for the pharmacological effects of NPS. Their performance in similarity searching and unsupervised clustering was assessed and compared to 2D structure fingerprints Morgan and MACCS (1024-bits ECFP4 and 166-bits SMARTS-based MACCS implementation of RDKit). The performance in retrieving compounds according to their pharmacological categorizations is influenced by the predicted active assay counts in Ph-fp and the choice of similarity metric. Overall, the comparative unsupervised clustering analysis suggests the use of a classification model with Morgan fingerprints as input for the construction of Ph-fp. This combination gives satisfactory clustering performance based on external and internal clustering validation indices.

Indexed as

Bioactivity dataMachine learningNew psychoactive substancesPharmacological affinity fingerprintSimilarity searchUnsupervised clustering

Identifiers

PMID35672835
PMCPMC9171973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.