ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2022
Pharmacological affinity fingerprints derived from bioactivity data for the identification of designer drugs.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combining Bayesian and Evidential Uncertainty Quantification for Improved Bioactivity Modeling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- MDFGNN-SMMA: prediction of potential small molecule-miRNA associations based on multi-source data fusion and graph neural networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Supervised Screening of EGFR Inhibitors Validated through Computational Structural Biology Approaches.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2024Article
- MIFAM-DTI: a drug-target interactions predicting model based on multi-source information fusion and attention mechanism.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Scipion-Chem: An Open Platform for Virtual Drug Screening.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Correction to: Pharmacological affinity fingerprints derived from bioactivity data for the identification of designer drugs.Journal of cheminformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Facing the continuous emergence of new psychoactive substances (NPS) and their threat to public health, more effective methods for NPS prediction and identification are critical. In this study, the pharmacological affinity fingerprints (Ph-fp) of NPS compounds were predicted by Random Forest classification models using bioactivity data from the ChEMBL database. The binary Ph-fp is the vector consisting of a compound's activity against a list of molecular targets reported to be responsible for the pharmacological effects of NPS. Their performance in similarity searching and unsupervised clustering was assessed and compared to 2D structure fingerprints Morgan and MACCS (1024-bits ECFP4 and 166-bits SMARTS-based MACCS implementation of RDKit). The performance in retrieving compounds according to their pharmacological categorizations is influenced by the predicted active assay counts in Ph-fp and the choice of similarity metric. Overall, the comparative unsupervised clustering analysis suggests the use of a classification model with Morgan fingerprints as input for the construction of Ph-fp. This combination gives satisfactory clustering performance based on external and internal clustering validation indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.