ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2022
Probabilistic metabolite annotation using retention time prediction and meta-learned projections.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolome restructuring reveals distinct virocell infection strategies in bacteriophage-host interaction.ISME communications · 2026Article
- MR1-ligand cross-linking identifies vitamin B6 metabolites as TCR-reactive antigens.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Northern peatland microbial communities exhibit resistance to warming and acquire electron acceptors from soil organic matter.Nature communications · 2025Article
- ROASMI: accelerating small molecule identification by repurposing retention data.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence to quantitative structure-retention relationship calculations in chromatography.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- AI redefines mass spectrometry chemicals identification: retention time prediction in metabolomics and for a Human Exposome Project.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Biosynthetic enzyme analysis identifies a protective role for TLR4-acting gut microbial sulfonolipids in inflammatory bowel disease.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Insights into predicting small molecule retention times in liquid chromatography using deep learning.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Review
- Physicochemical modelling of the retention mechanism of temperature-responsive polymeric columns for HPLC through machine learning algorithms.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- Performance and robustness of small molecule retention time prediction with molecular graph neural networks in industrial drug discovery campaigns.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Generic and accurate prediction of retention times in liquid chromatography by post-projection calibration.Communications chemistry · 2024Article
- RT-Transformer: retention time prediction for metabolite annotation to assist in metabolite identification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Good practices and recommendations for using and benchmarking computational metabolomics metabolite annotation tools.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022Review
- Contribution of allergy in the acquisition of uncontrolled severe asthma.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retention time information is used for metabolite annotation in metabolomic experiments. But its usefulness is hindered by the availability of experimental retention time data in metabolomic databases, and by the lack of reproducibility between different chromatographic methods. Accurate prediction of retention time for a given chromatographic method would be a valuable support for metabolite annotation. We have trained state-of-the-art machine learning regressors using the 80, 038 experimental retention times from the METLIN Small Molecule Retention Tim (SMRT) dataset. The models included deep neural networks, deep kernel learning, several gradient boosting models, and a blending approach. 5, 666 molecular descriptors and 2, 214 fingerprints (MACCS166, Extended Connectivity, and Path Fingerprints fingerprints) were generated with the alvaDesc software. The models were trained using only the descriptors, only the fingerprints, and both types of features simultaneously. Bayesian hyperparameter search was used for parameter tuning. To avoid data-leakage when reporting the performance metrics, nested cross-validation was employed. The best results were obtained by a heavily regularized deep neural network trained with cosine annealing warm restarts and stochastic weight averaging, achieving a mean and median absolute errors of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively. To the best of our knowledge, these are the most accurate predictions published up to date over the SMRT dataset. To project retention times between chromatographic methods, a novel Bayesian meta-learning approach that can learn from just a few molecules is proposed. By applying this projection between the deep neural network retention time predictions and a given chromatographic method, our approach can be integrated into a metabolite annotation workflow to obtain z-scores for the candidate annotations. To this end, it is enough that just as few as 10 molecules of a given experiment have been identified (probably by using pure metabolite standards). The use of z-scores permits considering the uncertainty in the projection when ranking candidates, and not only the accuracy. In this scenario, our results show that in 68% of the cases the correct molecule was among the top three candidates filtered by mass and ranked according to z-scores. This shows the usefulness of this information to support metabolite annotation. Python code is available on GitHub at https://github.com/constantino-garcia/cmmrt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.