Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35672782›Full record

ArticleResearch integrity and peer review2022

ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol.

William T Gattrell, Amrit Pali Hungin, Amy Price, Christopher C Winchester, David Tovey, Ellen L Hughes, Esther J van Zuuren, Keith Goldman, Patricia Logullo, Robert Matheis and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research integrity and peer review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07638540 (Standardising Terminology, Classification, Diagnostic Recognition and Reporting of Patient-Ventilator Interactions), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07638540 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Standardising Terminology, Classification, Diagnostic Recognition and Reporting of Patient-Ventilator Interactions: Protocol for an International Delphi Consensus Study (INTERACT)

TypeobservationalSponsorAl Adan Hospital KuwaitRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsPatient-Ventilator Interaction, Asynchrony, Patient-VentilatorArmsModified Delphi consensus survey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

William T GattrellGlobal Medical Affairs, Ipsen, Abingdon, UK. wgattrell@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9733-6330
Amrit Pali HunginFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Amy PriceStanford Anesthesia, Informatics and Media Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5200-7322
Christopher C WinchesterOxford PharmaGenesis, Tubney, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3267-3990
David ToveyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, Sussex, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8889-9246
Ellen L HughesSciwright Limited, Somerset, UK.
Esther J van ZuurenLeiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4780-0182
Keith GoldmanGlobal Medical Affairs, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5497-8413
Patricia LogulloCentre for Statistics in Medicine (CSM), University of Oxford, and EQUATOR Network UK Centre, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8708-7003
Robert MatheisInternational Society for Medical Publication Professionals, New York, NY, USA.
Niall HarrisonOgilvy Health, London, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 27294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStructured, systematic methods to formulate consensus recommendations, such as the Delphi process or nominal group technique, among others, provide the opportunity to harness the knowledge of experts to support clinical decision making in areas of uncertainty. They are widely used in biomedical research, in particular where disease characteristics or resource limitations mean that high-quality evidence generation is difficult. However, poor reporting of methods used to reach a consensus - for example, not clearly explaining the definition of consensus, or not stating how consensus group panellists were selected - can potentially undermine confidence in this type of research and hinder reproducibility. Our objective is therefore to systematically develop a reporting guideline to help the biomedical research and clinical practice community describe the methods or techniques used to reach consensus in a complete, transparent, and consistent manner.

methodsThe ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document) project will take place in five stages and follow the EQUATOR Network guidance for the development of reporting guidelines. In Stage 1, a multidisciplinary Steering Committee has been established to lead and coordinate the guideline development process. In Stage 2, a systematic literature review will identify evidence on the quality of the reporting of consensus methodology, to obtain potential items for a reporting checklist. In Stage 3, Delphi methodology will be used to reach consensus regarding the checklist items, first among the Steering Committee, and then among a broader Delphi panel comprising participants with a range of expertise, including patient representatives. In Stage 4, the reporting guideline will be finalised in a consensus meeting, along with the production of an Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document. In Stage 5, we plan to publish the reporting guideline and E&E document in open-access journals, supported by presentations at appropriate events. Dissemination of the reporting guideline, including a website linked to social media channels, is crucial for the document to be implemented in practice. DISCUSSION: The ACCORD reporting guideline will provide a set of minimum items that should be reported about methods used to achieve consensus, including approaches ranging from simple unstructured opinion gatherings to highly structured processes.

Indexed as

ChecklistConsensusConsensus development conferenceDelphi techniqueGuidelinesMethodologyNominal group techniqueReporting completenessReporting quality

Identifiers

PMID35672782
PMCPMC9171734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.