ArticleResearch integrity and peer review2022
ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol.
Article in Research integrity and peer review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07638540 (Standardising Terminology, Classification, Diagnostic Recognition and Reporting of Patient-Ventilator Interactions), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Standardising Terminology, Classification, Diagnostic Recognition and Reporting of Patient-Ventilator Interactions: Protocol for an International Delphi Consensus Study (INTERACT)
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prehabilitation for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: intervention development using the Medical Research Council Framework.Journal of ISAKOS : joint disorders & orthopaedic sports medicine · 2026Pooled it
- ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi.PLoS medicine · 2024Guideline
- Existing guidance on reporting of consensus methodology: a systematic review to inform ACCORD guideline development.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical Guidelines for Hepatitis E Vaccination in India: An Expert Panel Consensus Report on the Recombinant Hepatitis E Vaccine, HEV 239.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Strengthening capacity for basic hand therapy in South Africa: A consensus development conference and nominal group technique.Hand therapy · 2026Article
- ILAE dietary treatments task force special report: Maternal ketogenic diet exposure in epilepsy pregnancy registries-A call to action.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Developing a consensus-based competency framework for hospital pharmacists in the management of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs): a modified delphi study in Macao.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- EGPAware: a European Delphi consensus study on red flags for suspicion of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Iterative Large Language Model-Guided Sampling and Expert-Annotated Benchmark Corpus for Harmful Suicide Content Detection: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Post-operative practice patterns after the bidirectional Glenn surgery: a survey.Cardiology in the young · 2026Article
- Vascular access in the newborn: a position paper of Neonatal European Vascular Access Teams (NEVAT).European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Article
- Protocol for developing an evidence-based expert consensus on efficacy evaluation and comorbidity management of integrated Chinese and Western medicine for pediatric tic disorders: a GRADE-based modified Delphi study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a deprescribing tool relevant to older persons in India using modified Delphi consensus technique.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Delphi Consensus in Otolaryngology: A Systematic Review of Reliability and Reporting Completeness.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Standardizing Methodologies in Prosthodontics to Improve Research Reliability and Peer Review Efficiency: A Perspective-Based Proposal.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Consensus from European experts on severe eosinophilic asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Results from the OverSEA Delphi study.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Article
- Clinical practice recommendations and expected outcomes with fluorescent light energy: a Delphi-like consensus.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStructured, systematic methods to formulate consensus recommendations, such as the Delphi process or nominal group technique, among others, provide the opportunity to harness the knowledge of experts to support clinical decision making in areas of uncertainty. They are widely used in biomedical research, in particular where disease characteristics or resource limitations mean that high-quality evidence generation is difficult. However, poor reporting of methods used to reach a consensus - for example, not clearly explaining the definition of consensus, or not stating how consensus group panellists were selected - can potentially undermine confidence in this type of research and hinder reproducibility. Our objective is therefore to systematically develop a reporting guideline to help the biomedical research and clinical practice community describe the methods or techniques used to reach consensus in a complete, transparent, and consistent manner.
methodsThe ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document) project will take place in five stages and follow the EQUATOR Network guidance for the development of reporting guidelines. In Stage 1, a multidisciplinary Steering Committee has been established to lead and coordinate the guideline development process. In Stage 2, a systematic literature review will identify evidence on the quality of the reporting of consensus methodology, to obtain potential items for a reporting checklist. In Stage 3, Delphi methodology will be used to reach consensus regarding the checklist items, first among the Steering Committee, and then among a broader Delphi panel comprising participants with a range of expertise, including patient representatives. In Stage 4, the reporting guideline will be finalised in a consensus meeting, along with the production of an Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document. In Stage 5, we plan to publish the reporting guideline and E&E document in open-access journals, supported by presentations at appropriate events. Dissemination of the reporting guideline, including a website linked to social media channels, is crucial for the document to be implemented in practice. DISCUSSION: The ACCORD reporting guideline will provide a set of minimum items that should be reported about methods used to achieve consensus, including approaches ranging from simple unstructured opinion gatherings to highly structured processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.