Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35672758›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2022

Safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus catheter for drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax.

Shih-Yu Chen, Yao-Wen Kuo, Chao-Chi Ho, Huey-Dong Wu, Hao-Chien Wang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03724721 (To Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Vacuum Bottle Plus Catheter for Drainage of Pneumothorax), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03724721 nacompletednot on this map

To Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Vacuum Bottle Plus Catheter for Drainage of Pneumothorax

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2018 to 2020Enrolled23ConditionsIatrogenic Pneumothorax, Vacuum Bottle Assisted Needle AspirationArmsvacuum bottle
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shih-Yu ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yao-Wen KuoDepartment of Integrated Diagnostic and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. kyw@ntu.edu.tw.
Chao-Chi HoDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Huey-Dong WuDepartment of Integrated Diagnostic and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
Hao-Chien WangDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TW

Funding

National Taiwan University Hospital 108-N4357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIatrogenic pneumothorax is common after thoracic procedures. For patients with pneumothorax larger than 15%, simple aspiration is suggested. Although vacuum bottle plus non-tunneled catheter drainage has been performed in many institutions, its safety and efficacy remain to be assessed.

methodsThrough this prospective cohort study (NCT03724721), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus non-tunneled catheter drainage. Patients older than 20 years old who developed post-procedural pneumothorax were enrolled. A non-tunneled catheter was placed at the intersection of the midclavicular line and the second intercostal space. A 3-way stopcock, a drainage set, and a digital pressure gauge were connected. The stopcock was manipulated to connect the pleural space to the pressure gauge for measurement of end-expiration intrapleural pressure or to the vacuum bottle for air drainage. The rate of successful drainage, the end-expiration intrapleural pressure before, during, and after the procedure and the duration of hospitalization were recorded.

resultsFrom August 2018 to February 2020, 21 patients underwent vacuum bottle plus catheter drainage (intervention group) and 31 patients received conservative treatment (control group). The end-expiration intrapleural pressure of all patients remained less than - 20 cmH

conclusionsVacuum bottle plus catheter drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax is a safe and efficient procedure. It may be considered as an alternative management of stable post-procedural pneumothorax with size larger than 15%. Trial registration The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital (No. 201805105DINA) on 6th August, 2018. The first participant was enrolled on 23rd August, 2018 after Research Ethics Committee approval. This clinical trial complete registration at U.S. National Library of Medicine clinicaltrials.gov with identifier NCT03724721 and URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03724721 on 30th October, 2018.

Indexed as

DrainagePneumothoraxAdultCathetersHumansIatrogenic DiseaseProspective StudiesVacuumYoung AdultDrainage of pneumothoraxIatrogenic pneumothoraxIntrapleural pressureVacuum bottle

Identifiers

PMID35672758
PMCPMC9175504
OpenAlexW4281662489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.