ReviewBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022
Multidisciplinary treatment of retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: a case report and literature review.
Review in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Beyond the Usual: Diagnosing Ruptured Retroperitoneal Ectopic Pregnancy in a Patient With Negative Point-of-Care Ultrasound.Journal of acute medicine · 2026Article
- A rare case of a retroperitoneal pregnancy: case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy localized to the mesorectum: A case report and mini-review of literature.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Review
- Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Management and Diagnosis of Ectopic Splenic Pregnancy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Retroperitoneal Ectopic Pregnancy Detected by CT: A Case Report.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024Article
- A Case Report of Retroperitoneal Ectopic Pregnancy and Review of Literature.International journal of women's health · 2024Article
- The association between sexual function, quality of marital relationship and associated factors in women with a history of ectopic pregnancy: a cross-sectional study in Iran.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: successful expectant management in condition of early pregnancy failure.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- A Case Report of Retroperitoneal Ectopic Pregnancy After in vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer and Literature Review.International journal of women's health · 2023Article
- Rare Occurrence of Left Ampullary Ectopic Pregnancy After Ligation of the Left Fallopian Tube: A Case Report.International journal of women's health · 2023Article
- Unruptured ovarian ectopic pregnancy: Two case reports and literature review.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRetroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) is an extremely rare type of ectopic pregnancy, with a total of less than 32 cases reported in the English literature. Early diagnosis of REP is very difficult and all treatments entail a high risk of life-threatening complications. CASE PRESENTATION: A 29-year-old nulliparous woman presented a history of 50-day amenorrhea and 7-day upper abdominal pain without vaginal spotting. The serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) value was 65,004 m-international units per milliliter (mIU/mL), but no intrauterine gestational sac was found via transvaginal sonography (TVS). Then transabdominal ultrasonography (TAS) and abdominal contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) identified a retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) tightly adjacent to the inferior vena cava and the abdominal aorta. After consultation from a multidisciplinary team, systemic methotrexate (MTX, intramuscular 20 mg daily for 5 consecutive days) combined with ultrasound-guided local potassium chloride solution injection into the gestational sac was scheduled firstly for the patient. However, serum β-hCG continued to increase and the patient experienced worsening abdominal pain. Laparotomy was performed jointly by a gynecologist and a vascular surgeon. During the operation, the gestational sac with fetal bud measuring about 4.5 × 4.0x3.0 cm, tightly adherent to the surface of inferior vena cava and the left side of abdominal aorta, was carefully dissociated out from the surrounding tissues and removed en bloc. Histopathology examination confirmed the diagnosis of REP. The patient recovered uneventfully and her serum β-hCG returned to normal range on the 23
conclusionsConsidering the possibility of REP and combined radiological examinations, such as ultrasonography and CT, are crucial for the early diagnosis of this rare condition. A multidisciplinary team is necessary to treat REP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.