ArticleBMC cancer2022
Linking unfolded protein response to ovarian cancer cell fusion.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experimental Tumor Induction and Evaluation of Its Treatment in the Chicken Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane Model: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The Sleeping Giant: Metabolism and Autophagy in the Generation and Survival of Dormant Polyploid Giant Cancer Cells.MedComm · 2026Review
- Inhibition of SIK2 and SIK3 induces adaptive ER-phagy and creates a therapeutic vulnerability in ovarian cancer.Research square · 2026Article
- Etiology of polyploid giant cancer cells: a new frontier in cancer biology.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Implications of Heterotypic Cell Fusion in Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- BCAM-AKT2 fusion protein promotes unfolded protein response driven oncogenic signaling in SKOV3 epithelial ovarian cancer cell line.PloS one · 2026Article
- Genomic Reshuffling After Cell Fusion: Catalyst for Cancer Evolution and Progression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Microendoscopy for periodic intravital end-to-end tumor imaging of cancer cells.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Unveiling the power of mitochondrial transfer in cancer progression: a perspective in ovarian cancer.Journal of ovarian research · 2024Review
- Dormant cancer cells and polyploid giant cancer cells: The roots of cancer recurrence and metastasis.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024Review
- Mechanisms of Cell Fusion in Cancer.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024Review
- Polyploid giant cancer cells: origin, possible pathways of formation, characteristics, and mechanisms of regulation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Cell Fusion and Syncytia Formation in Cancer.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024Review
- Polyploidy, EZH2 upregulation, and transformation in cytomegalovirus-infected human ovarian epithelial cells.Oncogene · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- Extracellular Events Involved in Cancer Cell-Cell Fusion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Unfolded protein response complexity in gynecological tumor dynamics: therapeutic challenges and future perspectives.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPolyploid giant cancer cells (PGCCs) have been observed in epithelial ovarian tumors. They can resist antimitotic drugs, thus participating in tumor maintenance and recurrence. Although their origin remains unclear, PGCC formation seems to be enhanced by conditions that trigger the unfolded protein response (UPR) such as hypoxia or chemotherapeutic drugs like paclitaxel. Hypoxia has been shown to promote the formation of ovarian PGCCs by cell fusion. We thus hypothesized that the UPR could be involved in EOC cell fusion, possibly explaining the occurrence of PGCCs and the aggressiveness of EOC.
methodsThe UPR was induced in two ovarian cancer cell lines (SKOV3 and COV318). The UPR activation was assessed by Western blot and polyploidy indexes were calculated. Then, to confirm the implication of cell fusion in PGCC formation, two populations of SKOV3 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding for two distinct nuclear fluorescent proteins (GFP and mCherry) associated with different antibiotic resistance genes, and the two cell populations were mixed in co-culture. The co-culture was submitted to a double-antibiotic selection. The resulting cell population was characterized for its morphology, cyclicity, and proliferative and tumorigenic capacities, in addition to transcriptomic characterization.
resultsWe demonstrated that cell fusion could be involved in the generation of ovarian PGCCs and this process was promoted by paclitaxel and the UPR activation. Double-antibiotic treatment of PGCCs led to the selection of a pure population of cells containing both GFP- and mCherry-positive nuclei. Interestingly, after 3 weeks of selection, we observed that these cells were no longer polynucleated but displayed a single nucleus positive for both fluorescent proteins, suggesting that genetic material mixing had occurred. These cells had reinitiated their normal cell cycles, acquired an increased invasive capacity, and could form ovarian tumors in ovo.
conclusionsThe UPR activation increased the in vitro formation of PGCCs by cell fusion, with the newly generated cells further acquiring new properties. The UPR modulation in ovarian cancer patients could represent an interesting therapeutic strategy to avoid the formation of PGCCs and therefore limit cancer relapse and drug resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.