Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35672710›Full record

ArticleEmerging themes in epidemiology2022

Practicalities of implementing burden of disease research in Africa: lessons from a population survey component of our multi-partner FOCAL research project.

Binyam N Desta, Tesfaye Gobena, Custodia Macuamule, Olanrewaju E Fayemi, Christianah I Ayolabi, Blandina T Mmbaga, Kate M Thomas, Warren Dodd, Sara M Pires, Shannon E Majowicz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging themes in epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Burden of foodborne diseases: think global, act local.Current opinion in food science · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Binyam N DestaSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada. bndesta@uwaterloo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1814-7487
Tesfaye GobenaCollege of Health and Medical Science, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
Custodia MacuamuleFaculty of Veterinary, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
Olanrewaju E FayemiCentre for Research, Innovation, and Collaboration/Department of Biological Sciences, Mountain Top University, Prayer City, Nigeria.
Christianah I AyolabiCentre for Research, Innovation, and Collaboration/Department of Biological Sciences, Mountain Top University, Prayer City, Nigeria.
Blandina T MmbagaKilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Kate M ThomasKilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Warren DoddSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Sara M PiresRisk-Benefit Research Group, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Shannon E MajowiczSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Tine HaldResearch Group for Genomic Epidemiology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) of the United Kingdom Government OPP1195617Gates Foundation INV-008445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollaborative research is being increasingly implemented in Africa to study health-related issues, for example, the lack of evidence on disease burden, in particular for the presumptive high load of foodborne diseases. The FOCAL (Foodborne disease epidemiology, surveillance, and control in African LMIC) Project is a multi-partner study that includes a population survey to estimate the foodborne disease burden in four African low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Our multi-partner study team had members from seven countries, all of whom contributed to the project from the grant application stage, and who play(ed) specific roles in designing and implementing the population survey. MAIN TEXT: In this paper, we applied Larkan et al.'s framework for successful research partnerships in global health to self-evaluate our project's collaboration, management, and implementation process. Our partnership formation considered the interplay and balance between operations and relations. Using Larkan et al.'s seven core concepts (i.e., focus, values, equity, benefit, communication, leadership, and resolution), we reviewed the process stated above in an African context.

conclusionThrough our current partnership and research implementing a population survey to study disease burden in four African LMICs, we observed that successful partnerships need to consider these core concepts explicitly, apply the essential leadership attributes, perform assessment of external contexts before designing the research, and expect differences in work culture. While some of these experiences are common to research projects in general, the other best practices and challenges we discussed can help inform future foodborne disease burden work in Africa.

Indexed as

AfricaCollaborationExperiencesFoodborne disease burdenPartnershipPopulation survey

Identifiers

PMID35672710
PMCPMC9171481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.