Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35672686›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2022

Real-world disease-modifying therapy pathways from administrative claims data in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Robert J Fox, Rina Mehta, Timothy Pham, Julie Park, Kathleen Wilson, Machaon Bonafede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert J FoxMellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Rina MehtaBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Timothy PhamBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Julie ParkIBM Watson Health, 75 Binney Street, Cambridge, MB, USA.
Kathleen WilsonIBM Watson Health, 75 Binney Street, Cambridge, MB, USA. kawilson@us.ibm.com.
Machaon BonafedeIBM Watson Health, 75 Binney Street, Cambridge, MB, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver a dozen disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been approved for treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Treatment guidelines focus on when to initiate, change, and discontinue treatment but provide little guidance on how to select or sequence DMTs. This study assessed sequencing patterns of DMTs in patients with newly diagnosed MS.

methodsAdults newly diagnosed with MS in the United States were identified from January 2007 to October 2017 using IBM MarketScan database. Patients had ≥12 months of continuous enrollment prior to diagnosis and ≥ 2 years of follow-up. Treatment pathways consisting of up to 3 DMT courses were reported, and each treatment course ended with discontinuation, switch, or end of follow-up.

resultsIn total, 14,627 MS patients were treated with DMTs and had ≥2 years of follow-up. More than 400 DMT treatment pathways were observed. Glatiramer acetate was the most common DMT; 40% of patients initiated this treatment. Among these, 51.3% had 2 DMT courses during follow-up and 26.5% had 3 DMT courses. Approximately 70% of patients switched or discontinued their initial DMT, and rates of switch and discontinuation differed by initial DMT. Injectable DMTs were used most commonly over the study period (87.5% as first course to 66.6% as third course). Oral DMTs were more common as second or third treatment courses (29.9% and 31.8%, respectively).

conclusionsA wide variety in treatment patterns were observed among patients newly diagnosed with MS. Further examination of DMT prescribing practices is needed to understand the reasons behind treatment discontinuation and treatment cycling.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisAdultDatabases, FactualGlatiramer AcetateHumansRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesGlatiramer AcetateAdministrative claims databaseSankey diagramTreatment pathwayTreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID35672686
PMCPMC9172015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.