Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35672630›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022

Real-time denoising of ultrasound images based on deep learning.

Simone Cammarasana, Paolo Nicolardi, Giuseppe Patanè

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Super-resolution of 2D ultrasound images and videos.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Real-time denoising of ultrasound images based on deep learning.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simone CammarasanaCNR-IMATI, Via De Marini 6, Genoa, Italy. simone.cammarasana@ge.imati.cnr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2549-8330
Paolo NicolardiEsaote S.p.A., Via E. Melen 7, Genoa, Italy.
Giuseppe PatanèCNR-IMATI, Via De Marini 6, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2276-9553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound images are widespread in medical diagnosis for muscle-skeletal, cardiac, and obstetrical diseases, due to the efficiency and non-invasiveness of the acquisition methodology. However, ultrasound acquisition introduces noise in the signal, which corrupts the resulting image and affects further processing steps, e.g. segmentation and quantitative analysis. We define a novel deep learning framework for the real-time denoising of ultrasound images. Firstly, we compare state-of-the-art methods for denoising (e.g. spectral, low-rank methods) and select WNNM (Weighted Nuclear Norm Minimisation) as the best denoising in terms of accuracy, preservation of anatomical features, and edge enhancement. Then, we propose a tuned version of WNNM (tuned-WNNM) that improves the quality of the denoised images and extends its applicability to ultrasound images. Through a deep learning framework, the tuned-WNNM qualitatively and quantitatively replicates WNNM results in real-time. Finally, our approach is general in terms of its building blocks and parameters of the deep learning and high-performance computing framework; in fact, we can select different denoising algorithms and deep learning architectures.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise RatioUltrasonographyBiomedical dataDeep learningImage denoisingReal-time denoisingUltrasound images

Identifiers

PMID35672630
PMCPMC9293842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.