Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35672429›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Evaluation and comparison of antibiotic susceptibility profiles of Streptomyces spp. from clinical specimens revealed common and region-dependent resistance patterns.

Lucie Kotrbová, Ana Catalina Lara, Erika Corretto, Josef Scharfen, Vít Ulmann, Kateřina Petříčková, Alica Chroňáková

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genomic Exploration of a ChitinolyticCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Polyenic Antibiotics and Other Antifungal Compounds Produced by HemolyticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lucie KotrbováInstitute of Soil Biology, Biology Centre Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Na Sádkách 7, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czechia.
Ana Catalina LaraInstitute of Soil Biology, Biology Centre Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Na Sádkách 7, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czechia.
Erika CorrettoInstitute of Soil Biology, Biology Centre Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Na Sádkách 7, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czechia.
Josef ScharfenNational Laboratory for Pathogenic Actinomycetes, Trutnov Regional Hospital, Gorkého 77, 541 01, Trutnov, Czechia.
Vít UlmannPublic Health Institute Ostrava, Partyzánské náměstí 2633/7, 702 00, Ostrava, Czechia.
Kateřina PetříčkováInstitute of Immunology and Microbiology, 1St Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Studničkova 7, 128 00, Prague, Czechia.
Alica ChroňákováInstitute of Soil Biology, Biology Centre Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Na Sádkách 7, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czechia. alica.chronakova@upb.cas.cz.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Biology Centre · CZCharles University · CZInstitute of Soil Biology · CZPublic Health Institute Ostrava · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Notwithstanding the fact that streptomycetes are overlooked in clinical laboratories, studies describing their occurrence in disease and potential pathogenicity are emerging. Information on their species diversity in clinical specimens, aetiology and appropriate therapeutic treatment is scarce. We identified and evaluated the antibiotic susceptibility profile of 84 Streptomyces clinical isolates from the Czech Republic. In the absence of appropriate disk diffusion (DD) breakpoints for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of Streptomyces spp., we determined DD breakpoints by correlation with the broth microdilution method and by the distribution of zone diameters among isolates. Correlation accuracy was high for 9 antibiotics, leading to the establishment of the most valid DD breakpoints for Streptomyces antibiotic susceptibility evaluation so far. Clinical strains belonged to 17 different phylotypes dominated by a cluster of strains sharing the same percentage of 16S rRNA gene sequence identity with more than one species (S. albidoflavus group, S. hydrogenans, S. resistomycificus, S. griseochromogenes; 70% of isolates). AST results showed that Streptomyces exhibited intrinsic resistance to penicillin, general susceptibility to amikacin, gentamycin, vancomycin and linezolid, and high percentage of susceptibility to tetracyclines and clarithromycin. For the remaining antibiotics, AST showed inter- and intra-species variations when compared to available literature (erythromycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), indicating a region-dependent rather than species-specific patterns.

Indexed as

StreptomycesAnti-Bacterial AgentsLinezolidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsLinezolidRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID35672429
PMCPMC9174267
OpenAlexW4281871573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.