Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35672375›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Subfascial infiltration of 0.5% ropivacaine, but not 0.25% ropivacaine, exacerbates damage and inflammation in surgically incised abdominal muscles of rats.

Dandan Shen, Yuki Sugiyama, Kumiko Ishida, Satoshi Fuseya, Takashi Ishida, Mikito Kawamata, Satoshi Tanaka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dandan ShenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto City, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Yuki SugiyamaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto City, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Kumiko IshidaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto City, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Satoshi FuseyaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto City, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Takashi IshidaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto City, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Mikito KawamataDepartment of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto City, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Satoshi TanakaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto City, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan. s_tanaka@shinshu-u.ac.jp.
Shinshu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ropivacaine-induced myotoxicity in surgically incised muscles has not been fully investigated. We evaluated the effects of infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine on damage, inflammation and regeneration in the incised muscles of rats undergoing laparotomy. Ropivacaine or saline was infiltrated below the muscle fascia over the incised muscles. Pain-related behaviors and histological muscle damage were assessed. Macrophage infiltration at days 2 and 5 and proliferation of satellite cells at day 5 were detected by CD68 and MyoD immunostaining, respectively. Pain-related behaviors were inhibited by 0.25% and 0.5% of ropivacaine for 2 h after surgery. Single infiltration of 0.5% ropivacaine did not induce injury in intact muscles without incision, but single and repeated infiltration of 0.5% ropivacaine significantly augmented laparotomy-induced muscle injury and increased the numbers of CD68-positve macrophages and MyoD-positive cells compared to those in rats with infiltration of saline or 0.25% ropivacaine. In contrast, there were no significant differences in them between rats with saline infusion and rats with 0.25% ropivacaine infiltration. In conclusion, single or repeated subfascial infiltration of 0.25% ropivacaine can be used without exacerbating the damage and inflammation in surgically incised muscles, but the use of 0.5% ropivacaine may be a concern because of potentially increased muscle damage.

Indexed as

AmidesAnesthetics, LocalAbdominal MusclesAnimalsInflammationPainPain MeasurementPostoperative PainRatsRopivacaineAmidesAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaine

Identifiers

PMID35672375
PMCPMC9174254
OpenAlexW4281968449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.