ArticleNature communications2022
Low level of anthropization linked to harsh vertebrate biodiversity declines in Amazonia.
Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A unified analysis of global riverine eDNA reveals common associations of fish biodiversity with drainage characteristics.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Effects of anthropogenic influences in the DNA methylation and expression of genes involved in the metabolism of Geophagus surinamensis from the Pará River (Amazon, Brazil).Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Near complete 12S DNA reference library for the freshwater fish of French Guiana, northern Amazonian region.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Assessing fish diversity in small streams and ponds of the Peruvian Amazon using environmental DNA metabarcoding.ZooKeys · 2026Article
- Population Density and Spatial-Temporal Activity Pattern of the Tibetan Wolf in Dulan, Qinghai, China.Biology · 2025Article
- Elusive tropical forest canopy diversity revealed through environmental DNA contained in rainwater.Science advances · 2025Article
- The socioeconomic and environmental niche of protected areas reveals global conservation gaps and opportunities.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Deforestation strengthens environmental filtering and competitive exclusion in Neotropical streams and rivers.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Species invasiveness and community invasibility of North American freshwater fish fauna revealed via trait-based analysis.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing the impact of human activity on ecosystems often links local biodiversity to disturbances measured within the same locality. However, remote disturbances may also affect local biodiversity. Here, we used environmental DNA metabarcoding to evaluate the relationships between vertebrate biodiversity (fish and mammals) and disturbance intensity in two Amazonian rivers. Measurements of anthropic disturbance -here forest cover losses- were made from the immediate vicinity of the biodiversity sampling sites to up to 90 km upstream. The findings suggest that anthropization had a spatially extended impact on biodiversity. Forest cover losses of <11% in areas up to 30 km upstream from the biodiversity sampling sites were linked to reductions of >22% in taxonomic and functional richness of both terrestrial and aquatic fauna. This underscores the vulnerability of Amazonian biodiversity even to low anthropization levels. The similar responses of aquatic and terrestrial fauna to remote disturbances indicate the need for cross-ecosystem conservation plans that consider the spatially extended effects of anthropization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.