ReviewJMIR aging2022
The Effect of Cognitive Function Health Care Using Artificial Intelligence Robots for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in JMIR aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Home-Based Cognitive Intervention for Healthy Older Adults Through Asking Robots Questions: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR aging · 2024Trial
- Research hotspots, knowledge structure, and emerging trends in healthcare robotics for older adults: a bibliometric analysis (2015-2026).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- The Six-Facet Artificial Intelligence Literacy Questionnaire (SFAILQ): Assessing AI Literacy in Adolescents, Young Adults, and Midlife Adults.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Empowers Physical Therapy for Older Adults: A Perspective.Health science reports · 2026Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Medication Management for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2026Review
- AI in geriatric psychiatry: precision meets human experience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- The Role of AI in Improving Digital Wellness Among Older Adults: Comparative Bibliometric Analysis.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- Promoting healthy aging in a digital world: leveraging technology for enhanced elderly care and wellbeing.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- Care Robots for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Integrative Review.Healthcare informatics research · 2025Article
- Beneficial effect of artificial intelligence care call on memory and depression in community dwelling individuals with dementia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Health Care Social Robots in the Age of Generative AI: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Perspectives on AI and Novel Technologies Among Older Adults, Clinicians, Payers, Investors, and Developers.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Integrating AI and Assistive Technologies in Healthcare: Insights from a Narrative Review of Reviews.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessment of Digital Capabilities by 9 Countries in the Alliance for Healthy Cities Using AI: Cross-Sectional Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- [The effect of an internet of things-based mobile health management application for older adults depending on user engagement in South Korea: a secondary analysis of a quasi-experimental study].Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2025Article
- The PDC30 Chatbot-Development of a Psychoeducational Resource on Dementia Caregiving Among Family Caregivers: Mixed Methods Acceptability Study.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of artificial intelligence robot interventions on psychological health in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review.Journal of Korean gerontological nursing · 2024Review
- Impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith rapidly aging populations in most parts of the world, it is only natural that the need for caregivers for older adults is going to increase in the near future. Therefore, most technologically proficient countries are in the process of using artificial intelligence (AI) to build socially assistive robots (SAR) to play the role of caregivers in enhancing interaction and social participation among older adults.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine the effect of intervention through AI SAR on the cognitive function of older adults through a systematic literature review.
methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of the various existing studies on the effect of AI SAR on the cognitive function of older adults to standardize the results and clarify the effect of each method and indicator. Cochrane collaboration and the systematic literature review flow of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) were used on original, peer-reviewed studies published from January 2010 to March 2022. The search words were derived by combining keywords including Population, Intervention, and Outcome-according to the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time, Setting, and Study Design principle-for the question "What is the effect of AI SAR on the cognitive function of older adults in comparison with a control group?" (Population: adults aged ≥65 years; Intervention: AI SAR; Comparison: comparison group; Outcome: popular function; and Study Design: prospective study). For any study, if one condition among subjects, intervention, comparison, or study design was different from those indicated, the study was excluded from the literature review.
resultsIn total, 9 studies were selected (6 randomized controlled trials and 3 quasi-experimental design studies) for the meta-analysis. Publication bias was examined using the contour-enhanced funnel plot method to confirm the reliability and validity of the 9 studies. The meta-analysis revealed that the average effect size of AI SAR was shown to be Hedges g=0.43 (95% CI -0.04 to 0.90), indicating that AI SAR are effective in reducing the Mini Mental State Examination scale, which reflects cognitive function.
conclusionsThe 9 studies that were analyzed used SAR in the form of animals, robots, and humans. Among them, AI SAR in anthropomorphic form were able to improve cognitive function more effectively. The development and expansion of AI SAR programs to various functions including health notification, play therapy, counseling service, conversation, and dementia prevention programs are expected to improve the quality of care for older adults and prevent the overload of caregivers. AI SAR can be considered a representative, digital, and social prescription program and a nonpharmacological intervention program that communicates with older adults 24 hours a day. Despite its effectiveness, ethical issues, the digital literacy needs of older adults, social awareness and reliability, and technological advancement pose challenges in implementing AI SAR. Future research should include bigger sample sizes, pre-post studies, as well as studies using an older adult control group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.