ArticleTrends in cancer2022
Shadow mentoring: a cost-benefit review for reform.
Article in Trends in cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effective mentoring in the academic biomedical sciences: a collaborative effort that takes a village.Advances in physiology education · 2026Article
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion in a polarized world: Navigating challenges and opportunities in STEMM.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024Article
- The graduate school guide: How to prepare for the qualifying exam and assemble a thesis/graduate committee.Journal of cellular physiology · 2024Review
- Running a successful STEMM summer program: A week-by-week guide.Journal of cellular physiology · 2024Review
- The power of junior faculty mentoring committees.Journal of cellular physiology · 2024Review
- A review of undergraduate research programs aimed at underrepresented students.STAR protocols · 2024Review
- A guide to establishing, implementing, and optimizing diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) committees.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024Article
- How to be a GREAT mentor.Advances in physiology education · 2023Article
- Catalyst for Change: Future of DEI in Academia.Trends in chemistry · 2023Article
- Being the Alice of academia: lessons from the Red Queen hypothesis.Pathogens and disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shadow mentoring relationships are those outside of traditional mentoring roles and are an unseen yet critical component of trainee retention that is rarely acknowledged. In this paper, we detail the costs and benefits of shadow mentoring and propose mechanisms to ensure that shadow mentoring is acknowledged as a vital contribution to scientific communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.