Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35672153›Full record

ArticleDisability and rehabilitation2023

The Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) questionnaire: development and exploratory analyses of a new patient-reported outcome measure for rehabilitation.

T I Mol, C A M van Bennekom, E W M Scholten, J M A Visser-Meily, H Beckerman, P E C A Passier, R J E M Smeets, H R Schiphorst Preuper, M W M Post

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06782126 (Self-management Support After Burns), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06782126 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Self-management Support After Burns: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Stepped-wedge Hybrid Type 2 Effectiveness-implementation Study

TypeobservationalSponsorMartini Hospital GroningenRan2024 to 2026Enrolled146ConditionsBurnsArmsBreeZe (Brandwonden en Zelfmanagement)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

T I MolCenter of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, Netherlands.
C A M van BennekomHeliomare Rehabilitation Center, Research and Development, Wijk aan Zee, Netherlands.
E W M ScholtenCenter of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, Netherlands.
J M A Visser-MeilyCenter of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5955-8012
H BeckermanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
P E C A PassierDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sint Antonius General Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
R J E M SmeetsCIR Revalidatie, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9503-366X
H R Schiphorst PreuperDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
M W M PostCenter of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2205-9404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and explore underlying dimensions of the Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) and psychometric features of potential components. Further, to identify associations between the SeRA and disability-management self-efficacy, type of diagnosis, and type of rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND

methodsBased on a previously developed model of self-regulation, expert and patient opinions, and cognitive interviews, a list of 22 items on self-regulation (the SeRA) was constructed. The SeRA was included in a cross-sectional survey among a multi-diagnostic group of 563 former rehabilitation patients. Exploratory analyses were conducted.

resultsRespondents had a mean age of 56.5 (

conclusionThe SeRA is a new self-regulation measure with four subscales. Further research is needed to establish the validity and reliability of the SeRA. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Self-Regulation Assessment (SeRA) was developed to provide a comprehensive measurement of self-regulation among rehabilitation populations.The SeRA could potentially be used to identify persons with self-regulation problems at the start of rehabilitation treatment and measure outcomes of rehabilitation for self-regulation.The SeRA could potentially be used to help analyse outcomes of rehabilitation practice as well as evaluate interventions on self-regulation.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSelf-ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesexploratory factor analysespatient-reported outcome measuresrehabilitationSelf-regulationvalidation studies

Identifiers

PMID35672153
PMCPMC10243404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.