Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35672065›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Why are women still leaving academic medicine? A qualitative study within a London Medical School.

Victoria Salem, Dhruti Hirani, Clare Lloyd, Lesley Regan, Christopher J Peters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The quiet cost of gender bias in the operating room.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the lived experiences of early- and mid-career female academic GPs in the UK: a biographical narrative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Experiences of Women Faculty in an Academic Medical Center.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gender Gap in Parental Leave Among Physicians in Japan.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Creation and Program Evaluation of a Women in Surgery in ENT (WISE) Group.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victoria SalemDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK v.salem@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6463-7471
Dhruti HiraniDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Clare LloydNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Lesley ReganDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Christopher J PetersDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2081-5701
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify factors that influenced women who chose to leave academic medicine. DESIGN AND

main outcome measuresIndependent consultants led a focus group of women in medicine who had left academia after completion of their postgraduate research degree at Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine. Thematic analysis was performed on the transcribed conversations. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingNine women physicians who completed a postgraduate degree (MD or PhD) at a large London Medical School and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, but did not go on to pursue a career in academic medicine.

resultsInfluences to leave clinical academia were summarised under eight themes-career intentions, supervisor support, institutional human resources support, inclusivity, work-life balance, expectations, mentors and role models, and pregnancy and maternity leave.

conclusionThe women in our focus group reported several factors contributing to their decision to leave clinical academia, which included lack of mentoring tailored to specific needs, low levels of acceptance for flexible working to help meet parental responsibilities and perceived explicit gender biases. We summarise the multiple targeted strategies that Imperial College London has implemented to promote retention of women in academic medicine, although more research needs to be done to ascertain the most effective interventions.

Indexed as

MedicineSchools, MedicalAcademic Medical CentersFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansLondonMentorsPregnancyQualitative ResearchEDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID35672065
PMCPMC9174775
OpenAlexW4282927287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.