Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35672042›Full record

SynthesisCMAJ open

The effect of legislation on firearm-related deaths in Canada: a systematic review.

Nick Bennett, Manolhas Karkada, Mete Erdogan, Robert S Green, Heal-NS Research Program

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The epidemiology and deprivation profile of firearm-related injuries and deaths in British Columbia, Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nick BennettFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University (Bennett, Karkada); Nova Scotia Health Trauma Program (Erdogan, Green), Nova Scotia Health; Departments of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care (Green), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
Manolhas KarkadaFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University (Bennett, Karkada); Nova Scotia Health Trauma Program (Erdogan, Green), Nova Scotia Health; Departments of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care (Green), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
Mete ErdoganFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University (Bennett, Karkada); Nova Scotia Health Trauma Program (Erdogan, Green), Nova Scotia Health; Departments of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care (Green), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
Robert S GreenFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University (Bennett, Karkada); Nova Scotia Health Trauma Program (Erdogan, Green), Nova Scotia Health; Departments of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care (Green), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS greenrs@dal.ca.
Heal-NS Research Program
Nova Scotia Health Authority · CADalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFirearm misuse is common in cases of homicide, suicide and unintentional injury; this is a major public health issue, with societal and economic costs extending beyond the immediate injury or loss of life. We sought to review the evidence on the effectiveness of Canadian legislation in reducing deaths caused by firearms.

methodsFive databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus) were searched from inception to May 2021 for studies evaluating the effect of Canadian gun control laws Bill C-51 (1977), Bill C-17 (1991) and Bill C-68 (1995) on rates of firearm-related death. Two reviewers performed article screening independently and in duplicate. We synthesized data using descriptive statistics. The primary outcome of interest was firearm-related mortality rates. Because of study heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not performed.

resultsOverall, 1479 articles were screened, and 18 studies were included. Ten studies examined the effect on homicides, of which 5 reported a reduction during the postlegislation period; 1 study reported evidence of substitution from firearms to other methods of homicide among people aged 15-24 years. Eleven studies evaluated the effect on suicides, with 9 finding a reduction in suicide rates. Eight of these studies reported evidence of substitution from firearms to other suicide methods. Two studies investigated accidental deaths; neither reported any benefit after legislation.

interpretationEvidence supporting the effectiveness of Canadian firearms legislation in the reduction of homicide and accidental death rates is inconclusive; a decrease in firearm-related suicide rates was observed by most studies, but evidence of method substitution was also identified. Re-evaluation of existing laws may be beneficial to build an improved and effective evidence-based national framework for prevention of gun violence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020192486.

Indexed as

FirearmsSuicide PreventionCanadaHomicideHumansResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID35672042
PMCPMC9177199
OpenAlexW4281846713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.