Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35671674›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis and related disorders2022

Biomarker panel increases accuracy for identification of an MS relapse beyond sNfL.

Saurabh Gawde, Agnieshka Agasing, Neal Bhatt, Mackenzie Toliver, Gaurav Kumar, Kaylea Massey, Andrew Nguyen, Yang Mao-Draayer, Susan Macwana, Wade DeJager and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A framework for blood biomarker discovery in MS.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Role of soluble biomarkers in treating multiple sclerosis and neuroinflammatory conditions.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Current and Future Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Saurabh GawdeDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Agnieshka AgasingDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Neal BhattDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Mackenzie ToliverDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Gaurav KumarDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Kaylea MasseyDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Andrew NguyenDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Yang Mao-DraayerDepartment of Neurology, Autoimmunity Center of Excellence, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Susan MacwanaDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Wade DeJagerDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Joel M GuthridgeDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Gabriel PardoDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA; Multiple Sclerosis Center of Excellence, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Jeffrey DunnDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Robert C AxtellDepartment of Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. Electronic address: bob-axtell@omrf.org.
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation · USStanford University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Understanding the roles type I Interferon and TH17 play in Neuromyelitis Optica and other autoimmune diseases.R01AI137047 · NIAID · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI AXTELL, ROBERT C · 2018 to 2021
$2.8M
Pathogenic B cell and T helper cell interactions in Neuromyelitis OpticaR01EY027346 · NEI · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI AXTELL, ROBERT C · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
University of Michigan Clinical Autoimmunity Center of ExcellenceUM1AI144298 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FOX, DAVID ALAN, KHANNA, DINESH · 2019 to 2023
$546k
University of Michigan Autoimmunity Center of Excellence, Clinical Research ProgrUM1AI110557 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FOX, DAVID ALAN · 2014 to 2018
$543k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027346NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI137047NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI110557NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI144298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), there is a need for biomarker development beyond clinical manifestations and MRI. Soluble neurofilament light chain (sNfL) has emerged as a biomarker for inflammatory activity in RRMS. However, there are limitations to the accuracy of sNfL in identifying relapses. Here, we sought to identify a panel of biomarkers that would increase the precision of distinguishing patients in relapse compared to sNfL alone.

methodsWe used a multiplex approach to measure levels of 724 blood proteins in two distinct RRMS cohorts. Multiple t-tests with covariate correction determined biomarkers that were differentially regulated in relapse and remission. Logistic regression models determined the accuracy of biomarkers to distinguish relapses from remission.

resultsThe discovery cohort identified 37 proteins differentially abundant in active RRMS relapse compared to remission. The verification cohort confirmed four proteins, including sNfL, were altered in active RRMS relapse compared to remission. Logistic regression showed that the 4-protein panel identified active relapse with higher accuracy (AUC = 0.87) than sNfL alone (AUC = 0.69).

conclusionOur studies confirmed that sNfL is elevated during relapses in RRMS patients. Furthermore, we identified three other blood proteins, uPA, hK8 and DSG3 that were altered during relapse. Together, these four biomarkers could be used to monitor disease activity in RRMS patients.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingBiomarkersChronic DiseaseHumansRecurrenceBiomarkersBiomarkersMultiple sclerosisProteomicsRelapses

Identifiers

PMID35671674
PMCPMC9351348
OpenAlexW4281930837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.