Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35671541›Full record

ArticleCognition2022

Abstract representations of small sets in newborns.

Lucie Martin, Julien Marie, Mélanie Brun, Maria Dolores de Hevia, Arlette Streri, Véronique Izard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucie MartinUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, F-75006 Paris, France.
Julien MarieUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, F-75006 Paris, France.
Mélanie BrunUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, F-75006 Paris, France.
Maria Dolores de HeviaUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, F-75006 Paris, France.
Arlette StreriUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, F-75006 Paris, France.
Véronique IzardUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, F-75006 Paris, France. Electronic address: veronique.izard@u-paris.fr.

Funding

European Research Council 263179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the very first days of life, newborns are not tied to represent narrow, modality- and object-specific aspects of their environment. Rather, they sometimes react to abstract properties shared by stimuli of very different nature, such as approximate numerosity or magnitude. As of now, however, there is no evidence that newborns possess abstract representations that apply to small sets: in particular, while newborns can match large approximate numerosities across senses, this ability does not extend to small numerosities. In two experiments, we presented newborn infants (N = 64, age 17 to 98 h) with patterned sets AB or ABB simultaneously in the auditory and visual modalities. Auditory patterns were presented as periodic sequences of sounds (AB: triangle-drum-triangle-drum-triangle-drum …; ABB: triangle-drum-drum-triangle-drum-drum-triangle-drum-drum …), and visual patterns as arrays of 2 or 3 shapes (AB: circle-diamond; ABB: circle-diamond-diamond). In both experiments, we found that participants reacted and looked longer when the patterns matched across the auditory and visual modalities - provided that the first stimulus they received was congruent. These findings uncover the existence of yet another type of abstract representations at birth, applying to small sets. As such, they bolster the hypothesis that newborns are endowed with the capacity to represent their environment in broad strokes, in terms of its most abstract properties. This capacity for abstraction could later serve as a scaffold for infants to learn about the particular entities surrounding them.

Indexed as

Concept FormationHumansInfant, NewbornAmodal propertiesNewbornNumerosityPatternSet representations

Identifiers

PMID35671541
PMCPMC9289748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.