Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35671510›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022

Addressing barriers in comprehensiveness, accessibility, reusability, interoperability and reproducibility of computational models in systems biology.

Anna Niarakis, Dagmar Waltemath, James Glazier, Falk Schreiber, Sarah M Keating, David Nickerson, Claudine Chaouiya, Anne Siegel, Vincent Noël, Henning Hermjakob and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Spike sorting AI agent.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Making PBPK models more reproducible in practice.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Multi-scale models of whole cells: progress and challenges.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anna NiarakisUniversité Paris-Saclay, Laboratoire Européen de Recherche pour la Polyarthrite rhumatoïde - Genhotel, Univ Evry, Evry, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9687-7426
Dagmar WaltemathDepartment of Medical Informatics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5886-5563
James GlazierBiocomplexity Institute and Department of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Falk SchreiberDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Sarah M KeatingUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
David NickersonAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Claudine ChaouiyaAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, I2M, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2350-0756
Anne SiegelUniv Rennes, CNRS, Inria - IRISA lab. Rennes.ORCID 0000-0001-6542-1568
Vincent NoëlInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Henning HermjakobEMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8479-0262
Tomáš HelikarDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3653-1906
Sylvain SolimanLifeware Group, Inria, Saclay-île de France, 91120 Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5525-7418
Laurence CalzoneInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7835-1148

Funding

TR&D Project 4. The Imaging Stage: Multiscale Spatiotemporal Modeling of Macromolecular Systems in Cellular NeighborhoodsP41GM109824 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI ROUT, MICHAEL P · 2014 to 2023
$18.8M
Software for collaborative construction, simulation, and analysis of mechanistic computational models of biological systemsR35GM119770 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI Tomas Helikar · 2016 to 2026
$4.4M
Competitive Renewal of Development, Improvement and Extension of the Tissue Simulation Environment - CompuCell3DR01GM122424 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI GLAZIER, JAMES ALEXANDER · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
Dissemination of libRoadRunner and CompuCell3DU24EB028887 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GLAZIER, JAMES ALEXANDER, SAURO, HERBERT M. · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N019474/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N019482/1NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB028887NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM109824NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122424NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models are often employed in systems biology to study the dynamic behaviours of complex systems. With the rise in the number of computational models, finding ways to improve the reusability of these models and their ability to reproduce virtual experiments becomes critical. Correct and effective model annotation in community-supported and standardised formats is necessary for this improvement. Here, we present recent efforts toward a common framework for annotated, accessible, reproducible and interoperable computational models in biology, and discuss key challenges of the field.

Indexed as

Computational BiologySystems BiologyComputer SimulationReproducibility of Resultscommunity standardscomputational modellingmodel annotationsreproducibilitysystems biology

Identifiers

PMID35671510
PMCPMC9294410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.