ArticleMolecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI2022
Article in Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Potyviruses comprise the largest and most important group of plant positive-strand RNA viruses. The potyviral cell-to-cell movement protein P3N-PIPO is expressed via transcriptional slippage at a conserved GAAAAAA sequence, leading to insertion of an extra 'A' in a proportion of viral transcripts. Transcriptional slippage is determined by the potyviral replicase, the conserved slippery site, and its flanking nucleotides. Here, we investigate the dynamics of transcriptional slippage at different slip-site sequences, infection stages, and environmental conditions. We detect a modest increase in the level of transcripts with insertion towards later timepoints. In addition, we investigate the fate of transcripts with insertion by separately looking at different RNA subpopulations: (+)RNA, (-)RNA, translated RNA, and virion RNA. We find differences in insertional slippage between (+)RNA and (-)RNA but not other subpopulations. Our results suggest that there can be selection against the use of (-)RNAs with insertions as templates for transcription or replication and demonstrate that insertional slippage can occur at high frequency also during (-)RNA synthesis. Since transcripts with insertions are potential targets for degradation, we investigate the connection to nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). We find that these transcripts are targeted to NMD, but we only observe an impact on the level of transcripts with insertion when the insertional slippage rate is high. Together, these results further our understanding of the mechanism and elucidate the dynamics of potyviral transcriptional slippage. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0 International license.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.